What's new

The England Thread

Kendinho

New Member
Feb 28, 2014
18
19
If the England team worked as hard and as together as the US team they would still be in the tournament imo.

The reason the US team had to rely on Howard to stop it being a cricket score was down to the difference in ability between the two teams and in the end hard work and being well organised wasn't going to be able to bridge that gap in ability. (Although sometimes it can.)

I think that's letting some sloppy US play off the hook to be honest. Yes we'd all like to see England work harder, but I'm not sure I'd like to see them play like the US did, cut and thrust play, leaving the keeper to have one of the best performances in World Cup history to keep it from being a thrashing.

Against Italy we had the same number of shots (overall and on target) as the US last night and forced more corners, despite having less posession. Against Uruguay we dominated possession, had 6 shots on target to Uruguay's 2 and 12 overall to Uruguay's 8.

I really don't think there was anything overly special about how the US went about their business last night to be honest. They actually made Belgium look good in fact - something they hadn't looked in the group stages at all.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,267
47,354
I think people are forgetting how unlucky we were tbh.

Sure we deserved to go home. But it could easily have been different bar a few fractions of inches.

I don't buy the coaching thing. Pretty much all prem clubs have excellent facilities and top European standard coaching systems.

I still maintain our core problem is the pool of talent. There just simply isn't enough English players playing top flight football in England or, lol, Europe for us to get a capable team good enough to mix it with the big guns like Costa Rica.

It must be something to do with the coaching though, particularly at the younger ages.

Teams aren't buying foreign players for fun. They are buying them because they are better than English players. The same can be said abroad. Foreign teams don't buy English players because they simply aren't that good.

There isn't any reason why English players are any worse than, for example, Dutch players. There's not something in the water that is causing all English footballers to be a bit rubbish.

So for me it must be down to the coaching in some capacity, although at what stage in the coaching process the problem lies is anyone's guess.
 

Coyboy

The Double of 1961 is still The Double
Dec 3, 2004
15,506
5,032
If the England team worked as hard and as together as the US team they would still be in the tournament imo.

The reason the US team had to rely on Howard to stop it being a cricket score was down to the difference in ability between the two teams and in the end hard work and being well organised wasn't going to be able to bridge that gap in ability. (Although sometimes it can.)

But there's gaps in ability between Argentina and Switzerland, Germany and Algeria and Ghana and Germany as three examples and yet in those games there was nowhere near the same dominance by the stronger team, if at all. The US are pretty poor but try hard and have a good 'keeper as they have for years.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,030
29,611
Isn't it funny that sven was ridiculed so badly but in the grand scheme of things he did well in comparison?

I honestly don't think it has any thing to do with coaching at the top level. We have tried pretty much every different style of coach we can and none of them worked.

We just have too take a long view on this. As has been said multiple times over the last decade. English players don't have basic ball control. The simple act of receiving the ball and passing it to another player under pressure which is taken as a given in other countries.

This has to be developed from the ground up. Another worrying thing is our defending. Some thing we used to at least be solid at and have a number of options. Same goes with goal keepers?
Really because from where Im standing we have tried very defensive managers and all of their CV's suggest they were at best in Italy.

We have been more defensive than the italians and yet still don't know how to attack.

McLaren was labelled a joke but worth noting he was the last manager to beat a big team in a competitive match
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
26,985
61,896
Squad for the upcoming qualifiers
Goalkeepers:Fraser Forster (Southampton), Ben Foster (West Bromwich Albion), Joe Hart (Manchester City)

Defenders: Leighton Baines (Everton), Gary Cahill (Chelsea), Nathaniel Clyne (Southampton), Kieran Gibbs (Arsenal), Phil Jagielka (Everton), John Stones (Everton)

Midfielders: Fabian Delph (Aston Villa), Jordan Henderson (Liverpool), Adam Lallana (Liverpool), James Milner (Manchester City), Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain (Arsenal), Jonjo Shelvey (Swansea City), Raheem Sterling (Liverpool), Andros Townsend (Tottenham Hotspur), Jack Wilshere (Arsenal)

Forwards: Rickie Lambert (Liverpool), Wayne Rooney (Manchester United), Daniel Welbeck (Arsenal).

Roy obviously thought "Fuck it. We don't need CB's, it's working really well for Man Utd".
 

0-Tibsy-0

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
11,348
44,159
Squad for the upcoming qualifiers

Roy obviously thought "Fuck it. We don't need CB's, it's working really well for Man Utd".[/quote]

I never thought i'd say this, but i'm not sure what Gibbs has done to get in over Rose recently....
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
26,985
61,896
I never thought i'd say this, but i'm not sure what Gibbs has done to get in over Rose recently....

True. I never get the logic of calling a player up (Danny Rose), not playing him and then dropping him from the next squad.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,894
32,581
Rose is unlucky. In the last squad, continued his good start to the season, but gets dropped...

This is my problem with England managers. I know you can go months without games and form changes, but surely you try and get a bit of consistency and pick a settled squad of players rather than keep chopping and changing in certain positions.
 

WalkerboyUK

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2009
21,658
23,476
Lambert has spent his Liverpool career so far sat on the bench.... stays in the England squad though.
 

Shanks

Kinda not anymore....
May 11, 2005
31,200
19,093
Well its good to see players who are actually playing decent for their clubs for a change.

Gibbs over Rose - I'd say Gibbs has probably been the better, but hardly by anything else. Baines will start in that position though so it doesn't matter much.

Bit light on defenders, not sure I'd have taken Lambert (has he actually played yet?), but if they were to take a big man, he's not a bad option and cannot think of anyone else either.
 

Bobbins

SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008
May 5, 2005
21,609
45,209
It's only San Marino and Estonia.

I'm glad they've kept the majority of the under-21's in the under-21's squad - it's what other countries tend to do much more than we do, and is the reason so many other countries have whole generations of players coming through to the international stage together, at the same stage of development, because they've learnt the game together, played together, and developed a way of playing together for the national team.

We just plonk in whatever flavour of the month Sky are promoting and have zero continuity or style of play for the England team.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,189
63,972
It's pretty dreadful that we're playing San Marino and Estonia, yet an ageing Lambert who sits on the bench gets picked over a young Berahino in the form of his life.

But I suppose the U21s are playing the playoffs so it makes sense for them to have all their strongest available.
 

nidge

Sand gets everywhere!!!!!
Staff
Jul 27, 2004
24,868
11,368
Purely from a Spurs point of view but what has Townsend done to deserve a call up?
 

Hoddle&Waddle

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2012
8,347
17,584
True. I never get the logic of calling a player up (Danny Rose), not playing him and then dropping him from the next squad.
Equally weird how Andros is back in when he's hardly played in the Prem. Really think we should have got rid of Hodgson when we had the chance.
 
Top