What's new

World Cup Discussion Thread - Day 15 (28 June)

ILS

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2008
3,803
6,913
Problem I have is if we win the group, beat Japan and lose to Brazil in the quarters the players will come back with their head held high and the country proud. We finish second and the lose to Colombia... Its we only beat two crap teams and Southgate is clueless, players are overrated.

Southgate has taken a massive risk with his team
 

Johnny J

Not the Kiwi you need but the one you deserve
Aug 18, 2012
18,707
49,316
Problem I have is if we win the group, beat Japan and lose to Brazil in the quarters the players will come back with their head held high and the country proud. We finish second and the lose to Colombia... Its we only beat two crap teams and Southgate is clueless, players are overrated.

Southgate has taken a massive risk with his team
Colombia have looked just as good as Brazil this WC. Agreed, it makes no sense.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,296
64,350
The winner of this group plays Japan, then potentially the winner of Brazil-Mexico and then one of France, Argentina, Uruguay, and Portugal while the runner-up plays Colombia, then the winner of Sweden-Switzerland and then one of Spain, Croatia, Russia, and Denmark.
I'd honestly rather Japan, Brazil, any of those four than Colombia, SWE/SUI and Spain or Croatia.

Don't get the logic here at all.
 

werty

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2005
25,117
26,414
Best way to stop the fuckery is only the top team goes through with a few best runners up, which will be possible when they expand the number of teams
Problem for that in this game is that they both are amongst the best runners-up even before this game. Just make the top seeded teams play in the first or second match. The only two groups where the top two teams have played each other last in this group and the Russia/Uruguay group, and they've been the least interesting groups.
 

lol

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2008
6,652
6,083
The winner of this group plays Japan, then potentially the winner of Brazil-Mexico and then one of France, Argentina, Uruguay, and Portugal while the runner-up plays Colombia, then the winner of Sweden-Switzerland and then one of Spain, Croatia, Russia, and Denmark.

ah. 2nd is indeed better.
 

Johnny J

Not the Kiwi you need but the one you deserve
Aug 18, 2012
18,707
49,316
rose needs to go into the starting line up..
Don't be silly. Whatever will we do without Young endlessly and predictably cutting back onto his right foot.
 

PLTuck

Eternal Optimist
Aug 22, 2006
16,034
33,435
Been arguing with various people all day that say oh 2nd is a better route to the final.

Did iceland teach us nothing?

No such thing as an easy knock out stage world cup game.


EDIT: Besides, isn't the chance to play (and hopefully beat) the likes of Brazil what the world cup is all about?
 
Top