- Jun 22, 2011
- 787
- 2,430
Bissouma shone for them, but I also like Cucurella. Another good piece of business (£16M). If only they could find a decent striker.
Now i'm confused. In the past, when players have pointed (Parker, Keane etc) that was the sign of a **** and they were roundly abused for itDid anyone notice how when Son nicked the ball in the build up to the first goal Ben Davies immediately pointed to where the pass needed to go (to PEH)? That's the sign of a well drilled team.
He's some player. Has the pace and power for the PL.Bissouma shone for them, but I also like Cucurella. Another good piece of business (£16M). If only they could find a decent striker.
See the Woolwich have avoided the big teams again.Drawn away to Middlesbrough in the 5th round.
View attachment 105269
Different styles of pointing. I think pointing needs a new thread. There is a robust debate to be had.Now i'm confused. In the past, when players have pointed (Parker, Keane etc) that was the sign of a **** and they were roundly abused for it
Reading your post reminds me of when i watched a five year old trying to tie his shoes laces with boxing gloves on.
Give it a rest mate.
For once think before posting.
The issue with calling him "slow" is that it unfairly suggests he isn't fast enough to be effective in his intended role.I was thinking. I hadn't followed the thread up until I posted. So if it was something mentioned over and over again I apologize.
It's just my initial opinion, he looked heavy legged, slow and not very agile. Am I not permitted to express an opinion? I didn't think it was inflammatory? Since I got a lot of hate, can I assume everyone else thought he was Aaron Lennon reincarnated?
The issue with calling him "slow" is that it unfairly suggests he isn't fast enough to be effective in his intended role.
Is he fast enough to be as disruptive as a Son, Lucas, or Traore? No, but few are, and he doesn't need to be.
And the evidence that he is "slow" is based based on a 20 minute cameo, in his first game in a new league, when we were up 2 goals and possession and defense were the focus. He lead two breakaways when we were not set up to counterattack, and he didn't have much support. It was more important to keep possession then score, so he didnt do anything risk like take on 2 brighton defenders.
People didnt give him a chance in my opinion. He came to the club with so much potential but due to varous factors, they were not realised as quickly as the boo boys would want.Has Sanchez really genuinely ironed out his weaknesses or has he just had a couple of good games? This site seems to pendulum heavily on the more fringe players based on their last few performances. That's not an accusation at yourself but I am genuinely interested whether people think something fundamental has changed or whether next week he'll misjudge a longball or go bambi on ice and everyone will be screaming murder.
I have watched Kessie a hell of lot over the last three seasons and I just don't see how he is so highly rated. His goalscoring numbers were decent last year but again yesterday he was oniminous as like most of this season. He had that breakout session at Atlanta but I don't think he has lived up to the hype ever since.Hence why I said "from the little I've seen".
I'm hardly gonna say "from the little I've seen, we should sign Bissouma over Kessie", which is what you seem to be assuming. Like I said, I know which one from what I have seen I prefer the look of up to now, but I know that can easily change from now until the summer after seeing more of the both of them.
It's also another sign that Ben Davies is a much better footballer than a lot of people here thought for a long time. For many years, he was shoehorned into a left back role that he could cope with, but didn't really suit him - except when he played for Wales, where it was clear enough how much more comfortable and effective he was as a left-sided defender.Did anyone notice how when Son nicked the ball in the build up to the first goal Ben Davies immediately pointed to where the pass needed to go (to PEH)? That's the sign of a well drilled team.
Your "opinion" is demonstrably, provably wrong. Kulusevski is not slow. That is a fact that is not subject to "opinion". Having an "opinion" on something that is factual is just, well, dumb. It's either correct or it's not. Yours is not.I was thinking. I hadn't followed the thread up until I posted. So if it was something mentioned over and over again I apologize.
It's just my initial opinion, he looked heavy legged, slow and not very agile. Am I not permitted to express an opinion? I didn't think it was inflammatory? Since I got a lot of hate, can I assume everyone else thought he was Aaron Lennon reincarnated?
I agree with your point but that's a really patronizing way of expressing it. Why be so unpleasant? I'm pretty sure you'd never talk to him like that if he was standing in front of you.Your "opinion" is demonstrably, provably wrong. Kulusevski is not slow. That is a fact that is not subject to "opinion". Having an "opinion" on something that is factual is just, well, dumb. It's either correct or it's not. Yours is not.
He is a faster than average footballer, as about a hundred clips, all over YouTube, of him outpacing multiple fullbacks and defenders will demonstrate, although at 6 feet plus, he hasn't the instant acceleration of an Aaron Lennon. He's not a speed merchant, but he is emphatically not slow. That is not an "opinion".
Furthermore, he didn't sprint during his appearance against Brighton. Sprinting wasn't called for by the footballing situations he was in, because we were protecting a 2 goal lead and we didn't need to take risks by trying to break behind their defence. We could control possession and build carefully. If Kulusevski doesn't try to sprint, how on earth do you know if he's fast or slow?
You don't. But that doesn't appear to have put you off mouthing the usual dreaded cliché "Am I not permitted to express an opinion?" Of course you are. Everyone has the right to be wrong. You are wrong.
Your "opinion" is demonstrably, provably wrong. Kulusevski is not slow. That is a fact that is not subject to "opinion". Having an "opinion" on something that is factual is just, well, dumb. It's either correct or it's not. Yours is not.
He is a faster than average footballer, as about a hundred clips, all over YouTube, of him outpacing multiple fullbacks and defenders will demonstrate, although at 6 feet plus, he hasn't the instant acceleration of an Aaron Lennon. He's not a speed merchant, but he is emphatically not slow. That is not an "opinion".
Furthermore, he didn't sprint during his appearance against Brighton. Sprinting wasn't called for by the footballing situations he was in, because we were protecting a 2 goal lead and we didn't need to take risks by trying to break behind their defence. We could control possession and build carefully. If Kulusevski doesn't try to sprint, how on earth do you know if he's fast or slow?
You don't. But that doesn't appear to have put you off mouthing the usual dreaded cliché "Am I not permitted to express an opinion?" Of course you are. Everyone has the right to be wrong. You are wrong.
Pointing on its own is fine. It's when it is accompanied by shouting or a 360 degree pirouette that it becomes offensive.Different styles of pointing. I think pointing needs a new thread. There is a robust debate to be had.
Sorry, I realise I'm late to this discussion but this is just bollocks.Supporters that go home, away and maybe Europe too are more entitled to an opinion etc than other ‘supporters’ imo
They also get to see the whole picture of a football match taking place, not just a little square box. It’s a completely different experience & opportunity to observe things (depending on where your seat is!!)