- Aug 31, 2012
- 1,743
- 7,056
why not throw edwards in the shopping basket while we are in the store.Porro in and Royal out would be a huge positive. I just hope we have an eye on a back up for Deki as when he is out our creativity nose dives
why not throw edwards in the shopping basket while we are in the store.Porro in and Royal out would be a huge positive. I just hope we have an eye on a back up for Deki as when he is out our creativity nose dives
Why would we want to do that?why not throw edwards in the shopping basket while we are in the store.
he ripped us to pieces in the first game we played and could cover both wings creativity. plus there's still part of me that wants to see our academy products come good at our club so probably biased thinking.Why would we want to do that?
It is biased thinking, he is nowhere near good enough for us.he ripped us to pieces in the first game we played and could cover both wings creativity. plus there's still part of me that wants to see our academy products come good at our club so probably biased thinking.
You must be a member of our transfer committee given that you seem to know we have "no plan", and have not been "identifying targets and working on deals for months like Liverpool"?Meanwhile Liverpool who have a tired, old midfield, dropping out the top 4, target both Jude Bellingham and E so Fernandez.
thats how to be ambitious, address your issues both short term and long term.
meanwhile at penny pinching with no real plan fc, we are looking at low quality players on a whim as per usual.
so frustrating. Liverpool have been identifying their targets and working on deals for months.
they have a relatively old team that needs an overhaul and we can replace them as a challenger and instead we meander instead of being decisive.
Liverpool is competing in a different talent pool from ours. Not sure how that is a fair comparison...Meanwhile Liverpool who have a tired, old midfield, dropping out the top 4, target both Jude Bellingham and Enzo Fernandez.
thats how to be ambitious, address your issues both short term and long term.
meanwhile at penny pinching with no real plan fc, we are looking at low quality players on a whim as per usual.
so frustrating. Liverpool have been identifying their targets and working on deals for months.
they have a relatively old team that needs an overhaul and we can replace them as a challenger and instead we meander instead of being decisive.
Meanwhile Liverpool who have a tired, old midfield, dropping out the top 4, target both Jude Bellingham and Enzo Fernandez.
thats how to be ambitious, address your issues both short term and long term.
meanwhile at penny pinching with no real plan fc, we are looking at low quality players on a whim as per usual.
so frustrating. Liverpool have been identifying their targets and working on deals for months.
they have a relatively old team that needs an overhaul and we can replace them as a challenger and instead we meander instead of being decisive.
I can’t remember a time where the club altered transfer policy/targets due to an injury.With the news Richarlison is out for about a month, I wonder if it will cause us to HAVE to target another forward in January. I know it's a position of need but I was a bit more calm about it since I know if a good opportunity arises they would take it. It's always tough in January and just would hate if we panic bought someone when there's limited options. Should be interesting either way
That does not make a lot of sense. If Richarlison is out a month, he would be back before we ever signed anyone.With the news Richarlison is out for about a month, I wonder if it will cause us to HAVE to target another forward in January.
he ripped us to pieces in the first game we played and could cover both wings creativity. plus there's still part of me that wants to see our academy products come good at our club so probably biased thinking.
Agreed with one exception, redknapp's first January window. We re signed defoe and then we got injured re signed Keane iircI can’t remember a time where the club altered transfer policy/targets due to an injury.
I don’t think it’s wise or realistic either to be honest.
I don't have a problem with going after cheaper deals as we've found out with Bentancur and Kulusevski they do work I know the jurys still out on the other deals but if we get it right it can be worthwhile Juve and Bayern do these cheaper deals every year.Meanwhile Liverpool who have a tired, old midfield, dropping out the top 4, target both Jude Bellingham and Enzo Fernandez.
thats how to be ambitious, address your issues both short term and long term.
meanwhile at penny pinching with no real plan fc, we are looking at low quality players on a whim as per usual.
so frustrating. Liverpool have been identifying their targets and working on deals for months.
they have a relatively old team that needs an overhaul and we can replace them as a challenger and instead we meander instead of being decisive.
Yep, this was already a weak area as shown if any of the top4 get injured then we don't have enough quality attacking depth for 2 games a week PL & CL as Lucas & Gil aren't up to it and we end up having to switch to a toothless 3-5-2.With the news Richarlison is out for about a month, I wonder if it will cause us to HAVE to target another forward in January. I know it's a position of need but I was a bit more calm about it since I know if a good opportunity arises they would take it. It's always tough in January and just would hate if we panic bought someone when there's limited options. Should be interesting either way
Yeah I'm not gonna dig the club out for not signing the likes of Bellingham or Enzo.
These players basically have a pick of who they wish to join so they are only going to go to Madrid, Liverpool, Barcelona, City, etc. We are below that range and even if we fronted 100m, we'd likely get rejected.
Bellingham had clubs all over Europe wanting him before he opted for Dortmund and he went there because his advisors knew Dortmund would be happy with a release clause and it would be a nice stepping stone.
Tottenham cannot be a stepping stone for these players and certainly shouldn't be giving players release clauses for 2 years, just so they can be then taken by City or Chelsea with no resistance from us. The fans would be in uproar for a start.
We need to find the Bentancur's and co, those who are maybe jot completely appreciated by the biggest clubs.
I think he had a good game against us over there but was completely ineffective at ours. I'll add to that he hasn't really changed from when he was here originally. We'd be stupid to take him back.he ripped us to pieces in the first game we played and could cover both wings creativity. plus there's still part of me that wants to see our academy products come good at our club so probably biased thinking.