You could have said the same thing when we took Trippier from relegates Burnley.
I like Maguire and wouldn't mind having him here as a rotational CB. He's as close as we're goign to get to Vertonghen in terms of carrying the ball out from the back - he really is exceptional in this area - and I wouldn't have thought he's that much slower than Vertonghen either.
If we're selling Wimmer then getting Maguire in as a replacement makes a lot of sense.
Burnley only conceded 16 more goals than us when we signed him. Their problem was scoring. Anyway it's a fair enough point. He's right footed @worcestersauce so not a Wimmer replacement.
Have heard some of our fans rip into him for some reason.
Is strong, has decent speed to him (he's not as slow as people make out) good at passing the ball out of defence and everytime I see him he looks fully committed which is what Poch wants
Wouldn't be sad if we get him
He's not good enough.. Makes Mertersaker look like Usain Bolt!!
Maguire has played LCB for Hull a lot I think.For that price you'd easily get Veltman, who also comfortably covers at RB. Problem is both are RCB, neither is left footed.
With a back three, or even a back four with the DM dropping to split the CB's, Poch typically favours the CB's on their natural side, as they become hybrids of FB and CB. The reason we appear to have reverted to a back 4 on occasion, is in my opinion because Poch doesn't have faith in Wimmer at LCB. Tried him against City and he got hooked, reverted to back 4 until Jan was fit. Likewise when Toby got injured, reverted to a back 4, perhaps wasn't comfortably with CCV coming in?
Key here is, does Poch feel he can mould Wimmer into a comfortable LCB, if not, then he needs replacing. Maguire isn't that player. Only reason for Maguire is if CCV isn't deemed close enough yet, or if Dier is being moved back into DM.
Maguire has played LCB for Hull a lot I think.