What's new

Match Threads ManU Vs Spurs

Date
Oct 19, 2022
KO Time
20:15
Score
ManU 2-0 Spurs
Fred (47) Fernandes (69)

Match Prediction

  • Spurs Win

    Votes: 62 42.2%
  • Man Utd Win

    Votes: 48 32.7%
  • Score Draw

    Votes: 36 24.5%
  • Goalless Draw

    Votes: 1 0.7%

  • Total voters
    147

Dannyspur

I just don't know anymore!
Aug 17, 2004
10,151
13,874
On top of the shitshow, we didn’t have any luck. On another day, the deflection off Davies could have gone wide and when the ball rebounded around on the edge of the area, it fell absolutely perfectly for Fernandez to volley in, again, that could have bounced anywhere else and the chance could have gone. Who knows, how that would have affected the outcome. We were awful and didn’t deserve anything, but those moments going the other way, may have allowed us to kick on in the second half as we have in other games this season.
 

jolsnogross

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2005
3,808
5,611
On top of the shitshow, we didn’t have any luck. On another day, the deflection off Davies could have gone wide and when the ball rebounded around on the edge of the area, it fell absolutely perfectly for Fernandez to volley in, again, that could have bounced anywhere else and the chance could have gone. Who knows, how that would have affected the outcome. We were awful and didn’t deserve anything, but those moments going the other way, may have allowed us to kick on in the second half as we have in other games this season.
That's a ridiculously narrow view on 'luck'. You create your own luck if you force situations high up the pitch. If you are raining shots in on goal, they don't all have to be worldies to go in. We created next to nothing and got nothing. We were atrocious playing out from the back. They forced the issue and got 2. The result flattered us, not luck flattering them.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,451
48,579
The lack of pace in our starting 11 last night was alarming. Everything needed precision and a slow build just to get up the field. Precision and poise we didn’t have.

In general the pace in our squad isn’t great. As I said in the Conte thread, we need to at least make sure we have pace at wing back, Perisic and Doherty are too slow to be able to counter quickly. The 352 quickly becomes a 532 and we struggle to get out, especially with any purpose.
It’s a simple but actually really good point.

If we aren’t going to play a high possession short passing, close together style which we obviously aren’t under conte and if we are going to play with wing backs like we do then pace should be a must throughout the squad.

If we had say prime Rose and Walker last night instead of Perisic and Doherty, we’d have had such a better outlet to breakaway when they’d shut us into the final 3rd. ESPECIALLY when playing 3-5-2 as you don’t have the 3 up top occupying their defenders.

For this reason alone I’d be very interested to see how a line-up when all are fit of the below would perform:
Lloris

Spence
Romero
Dier
Lenglet
Sessengon

Bissouma
Bentancur

Kulu/Richarlison
Kane
Son
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,451
48,579
On top of the shitshow, we didn’t have any luck. On another day, the deflection off Davies could have gone wide and when the ball rebounded around on the edge of the area, it fell absolutely perfectly for Fernandez to volley in, again, that could have bounced anywhere else and the chance could have gone. Who knows, how that would have affected the outcome. We were awful and didn’t deserve anything, but those moments going the other way, may have allowed us to kick on in the second half as we have in other games this season.
Luck was irrelevant last night mate
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
23,206
30,399
On top of the shitshow, we didn’t have any luck. On another day, the deflection off Davies could have gone wide and when the ball rebounded around on the edge of the area, it fell absolutely perfectly for Fernandez to volley in, again, that could have bounced anywhere else and the chance could have gone. Who knows, how that would have affected the outcome. We were awful and didn’t deserve anything, but those moments going the other way, may have allowed us to kick on in the second half as we have in other games this season.

I get the bad luck but when a team invites pressure then there is a higher probably that bad luck will happen
 

Colonel_Klinck

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2004
12,727
23,353
It's not Levy we should be questioning though, it's the judgements of both Conte and Paratici because they are jointly responsible for all the recruitment. Levy just provides the money.

Has Conte's recruitment been that bad? He's had 1 window, you can't fix a crap unbalanced squad in 1 window on our budget.

Don't get me wrong I think he doesn't help his self with the fans with some of his decision in the games but judging his recruitment from 1 window is harsh.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
Has Conte's recruitment been that bad? He's had 1 window, you can't fix a crap unbalanced squad in 1 window on our budget.

Don't get me wrong I think he doesn't help his self with the fans with some of his decision in the games but judging his recruitment from 1 window is harsh.

No no you misunderstood the tone of my post. Levy has handed the recruitment side of the club over to Paratici while he takes over the 'off the pitch' side of the business, whilst providing the finance for incoming transfers. Of course, both Fabio and Antonio are directly responsible for results to Levy, as Chairman.

Paratici and Conte work closely together to identify targets, so my point was, if any of our new boys are not proving up to scratch, they can really only look to themselves as possibly having made bad calls.

The whole point behind Levy hiring Paratici in the first place was precisely so that he could hand over the football side of the business. Blaming Levy for poor football recruiting decisions currently is a bit pointless really.
 

Colonel_Klinck

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2004
12,727
23,353
No no you misunderstood the tone of my post. Levy has handed the recruitment side of the club over to Paratici while he takes over the 'off the pitch' side of the business, whilst providing the finance for incoming transfers. Of course, both Fabio and Antonio are directly responsible for results to Levy, as Chairman.

Paratici and Conte work closely together to identify targets, so my point was, if any of our new boys are not proving up to scratch, they can really only look to themselves as possibly having made bad calls.

The whole point behind Levy hiring Paratici in the first place was precisely so that he could hand over the football side of the business. Blaming Levy for poor football recruiting decisions currently is a bit pointless really.

My point was Levy controls the purse strings and so can have the final say over player signings.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,030
5,703
As in, drop their levels to 'fit Tottenham'.
It's all in their heads, expectations, performance levels etc. If the same players arrive at City or Barca, do they perform better because they are expected too? It seems so.
I remember back in the 90’s, when the majority of transfers were still from the English leagues, that players who went from a lower league or lower PL club to one of the other Top 6 club raised their game as they now had the opportunity of trophies. Players who came to us on the other hand seemed to think more along the lines of; I’ve finally made the big time so that’s my pension sorted and I can kick back and relax now.
We as a club seem to drain the ambition and desire from our recruits.
As I say it’s like there is a curse in the club?.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
My point was Levy controls the purse strings and so can have the final say over player signings.

My understanding was that Levy provides the finances and leaves all the footballing decisions to Fabio. I don't think he has any 'say' over who comes in, but you're saying he does have the final say about any incomings. A subtle difference in our viewpoints but I guess neither of us actually knows the truth.
 

glacierSpurs

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2013
16,163
25,473
I may be wrong but I felt yesterday was a game Richarlison would have relished in, balls to the feet spinning drawing fouls and most of putting himself about. We seemed to lack physicality up front yesterday. Yes I know they didn't get a huge amount of service but we needed some absolute shit stirrer up top winding them up.
Agree. Needs his shithousery and drawing of fouls to break up the momentum of United. They were doing that to us but we just let them played their way uninterrupted. Lamela used to do that role very well.
 

hughy

I'm SUPER cereal.
Nov 18, 2007
31,956
57,239
On top of the shitshow, we didn’t have any luck. On another day, the deflection off Davies could have gone wide and when the ball rebounded around on the edge of the area, it fell absolutely perfectly for Fernandez to volley in, again, that could have bounced anywhere else and the chance could have gone. Who knows, how that would have affected the outcome. We were awful and didn’t deserve anything, but those moments going the other way, may have allowed us to kick on in the second half as we have in other games this season.
It works both ways. If anything I'd say we were lucky in the first half as opposed to unlucky in the second half.

The only thing lucky about Wednesday was the fact that it didn't end 5-0. We could have, and absolutely should have been totally embarrassed.
 

glacierSpurs

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2013
16,163
25,473
Despite a couple of wonderful early crossfield passes into the path of Matt Doherty, Harry Kane's use of the ball afterwards when he got it was woeful. His 59.1% pass success rate was the lowest on the pitch by a long, long way apart from United goalkeeper David De Gea's 53.1%.

Kane has the quality to take these sort of matches by the scruff of the neck with his ability to create, use his strength and score, but as the game wore on, aside from a couple of shots, he just faded into the background.

Like Hojbjerg, Kane had three key moments of bad control in attacking situations, giving the ball to United, while Son Heung-min had two such moments.

Son had a far better passing success rate, 80.8%, and played two key passes to Kane's one, but the South Korean was also anonymous for long periods. Unusually for him he didn't make a single dribble with the ball while Kane mustered only a couple of attempts.
Source: Football.London

One of the worse performance seen from Kane, not just Son.
 

Yantino

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2012
681
3,107
I don't think Son or Kane in particular can be expected to take much of the blame for Wednesday night's performance. They had scraps to feed off of and nothing more.
 

Monkey boy

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2011
6,452
17,191
Was listening to the view from the Lane podcast earlier and this stat sent a cold shiver down my spine. In the 3 games against Chelsea, Arsenal and Man Utd we conceded 66 shots against our goal, an average of 22 per game.
 

VoteMe4Prez

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2013
2,739
6,886
I still can't shake what I witnessed on Wednesday night. Just a spineless, limp and pathetic game we played. Completely downed tools after the first 10 minutes. A victory on Sunday is the only cure for this
 

cusop

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
1,092
188
I still can't shake what I witnessed on Wednesday night. Just a spineless, limp and pathetic game we played. Completely downed tools after the first 10 minutes. A victory on Sunday is the only cure for this
I do not think it is fair to call it spinless but it was a total shitshow is more accurate, not much else to add, Sunday will be a tough day at the office
 

Similar threads

Replies
3K
Views
128K
Replies
997
Views
67K
Replies
2K
Views
116K
Top