What's new

Nasri to Man City? (Breaking News on SSN)

TwoSaintsComeMarching

PIMP-tastic
Jul 26, 2008
2,404
454
According to "Sky sources"

... for 20million! :rofl:

He's worth almost double that!

If the scum lose both Fabregas and Nasri, we should be able to overtake them next year!
 

brett.spurs

Banned
May 22, 2007
7,388
2
Pretty sad if he does leave for City though. But even without him and Fabregas I'd be surprised if we did finish above them.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,267
47,354
With 60m to spend I reckon Wenger can replace Nasri (who was only good for 4 months last season) and Fabregas. Unfortunately he's pretty good at that. Everyone said when they lost Henry that they'd fall apart but they didn't really.

It's certainly an opportunity to try and close the gap, but it won't be straightforward.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,267
47,354
They'll still end up playing De Jong, Toure and Barry and then slowly pissing off all their attacking players.

I reckon Johnson will be available sooner rather than later.
 

Bobishism

*****istrator
Aug 23, 2004
15,035
126
With 60m to spend I reckon Wenger can replace Nasri (who was only good for 4 months last season) and Fabregas. Unfortunately he's pretty good at that. Everyone said when they lost Henry that they'd fall apart but they didn't really.

It's certainly an opportunity to try and close the gap, but it won't be straightforward.

Really? Thought he had a really good season.
 

gregga

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2005
2,282
1,315
If Nasri, Clichy and Fabregas all leave we really should be looking to overtake the Goons next season.

Assuming we can hold on to Modric, that is.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,523
78,131
With 60m to spend I reckon Wenger can replace Nasri (who was only good for 4 months last season) and Fabregas. Unfortunately he's pretty good at that. Everyone said when they lost Henry that they'd fall apart but they didn't really.

It's certainly an opportunity to try and close the gap, but it won't be straightforward.
They haven fallen apart but they haven't won anything since either.

This will be a big loss to them without a doubt. At least with Henry they already knew he was passing his peak. Nasri is not even in his peak yet.

I thought they could sell Fabregas and play Nasri in that role but now they're going to have to come up with something special. But it may take time for someone like Wilshere to reach that same level of a Fabregas or Nasri.
 

steventhfc

See man driving a german whip.
May 20, 2009
2,059
818
You seem to forget that all the best players leaving is certainly not an attractive proposition to new ones either....DO DO DO SHAME ABOUT THE ARSENAL.
 

Viva la Tottenham

New Member
Nov 21, 2010
1,873
0
Wilshere and Gibbs can replace Fab and Glichy although it would be a slight drop in quality but Wenger will just go and snap up afew more young gems on the cheap and with the money he makes he'll knock another chunk off their stadium debt. He's setting that lot up for life unfortunately that's why I laugh at the numpties who want rid of him.
 

kishman

Well-Known Member
Apr 22, 2005
10,575
771
I think it's a shame that players are leaving Arsenal for Man City. No way are Man City are a bigger club than Arsenal. I f***ing hate City.

But :lol: @ Arsenal.
 

Andy

Staff
Mar 21, 2005
7,833
418
if they do then we all know that he'll get £30m+ for cesc, £20m+nasri and about £10+ for clicky.
then he'll go out and spend thirty five million on three players who'll step up and be amazing. the french ****.
 

tobi

Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose
Jun 10, 2003
17,558
11,765
I think he'll end up at Man Utd.

Apparently Mancini doesn't like Adam 'I like a drink' Johnson.
 

TwoSaintsComeMarching

PIMP-tastic
Jul 26, 2008
2,404
454
Can anyone who has twitter tweet this to that cock Wilshere?

Don't see all the fuss about Nasri wanting a move.. he has done well at #Arsenal but he needs to play for a club that can win #trophies! #inmyopinion
 
Top