What's new

Match Ratings Ratings vs Huddersfield

MOTM

  • Gazzaniga

    Votes: 25 16.8%
  • Trippier

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Toby

    Votes: 5 3.4%
  • Sanchez

    Votes: 19 12.8%
  • Verts

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rose

    Votes: 7 4.7%
  • Dier

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dembele

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lucas

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • Son

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kane

    Votes: 81 54.4%
  • Wanyama

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Winks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sissoko

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 6 4.0%
  • None Deserved

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    149

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
I have mixed feelings after today. On the one hand, winning our fifth game out of seven and keeping pace with Chelsea/ Liverpool is very pleasing, this is amplified by the fact that we've played five of those seven games away from home and more so when you consider that in those seven games we have played two of the other top three from last season. Secondly, there were actually quite a few positive individual performances today. It is when realising this, however, that you wonder why the collective performance, though relatively applied and without lack endeavour/ industry was quite poor.

At the heart of this I would suggest is the formation. We played a 343, and it didn't suit us at all. Thankfully, Son and Moura were kept wide so the fullbacks were not left exposed like against Liverpool, so Pochettino has clearly learned something of a lesson there, but playing with three centre backs with two players in front of them who like to stay in their own half meant that we invited a lot of pressure and surrendered control. Yes, our defenders dealt with it well and the goalkeeper did his job, but that is aided by the poor quality of the opposition. We back off like that against most any of the top sides and we'll be found out. Additionally, I'm finding it harder and harder to have faith that our manager is meritocratic. If he was, Dier wouldn't keep surviving, nor would Trippier and Lamela would have started today, especially considering the lack of both Dele and Eriksen.

Another negative is of course the loss of Vertonghen. We need to pray that he finds fitness for the Barcelona game, thankfully he often recovers quickly, but without him we're looking at playing an untested backline, whatever the formation, against the greatest player of all time.

However, on the positive side are various strong individual performances, a bit more cohesion at the back than we have seen (in my opinion aided by a goalkeeper the defenders appear to trust) and an improvement in our play as the game wore on with us never really looking like conceding. All in all I'm cautiously pleased.

Gazzaniga, a couple of rubbish kicks aside, played well. He made a couple of relatively tricky situations seem routine, which is the sign of a good goalkeeper, and he never seems to let his concentration slip.

Alderweireld mopped up well the few times Huddersfield did get behind us, played the ball out pretty nicely, and lead the backline authoritatively once his compatriot was forced off injured.

Sanchez was better. I feel he's a bit jittery at the moment but overall he seemed composed, he brought the ball out nicely a couple of times and adapted well to playing on the left bar one occasion where he was beaten too easily. Imperious in the air too.

Vertonghen was fine up until injury.

Trippier put in a beauty of a cross for the opener and I don't remember the opposition getting in behind him. He's definitely happier in this formation than in a four man defence, I just worry that he's the only one. Found himself in advanced positions throughout the match.

Dier defensively was solid, but it is his defensiveness which sucked our team so deep in the first half and meant that one of the worst teams in the league were the aggressors. I don't mind him in midfield for a more attacking formation, either 433 or 4231, but when there's a three man defence his presence in front of it causes us to lose control of 2/3 of the pitch. Add in his total loss of concentration when passing on more than one occasion and and you've got as bad a midfield performance as you could hope for. At centre back he was okay, better when he went to the middle than his initial presence on the left.

Dembele was poor. Yes, his pass completion was great, but with one few attacker in front of him and 3.5 centre backs in essence shoring us up he really needs to be braver in his use of the ball. Like Dier, in a 4231 his simple, safe approach is generally acceptable because there is so much attacking quality in front of him, but in this formation he has to take responsibility. I'd caveat all of this by saying that when he was next to Wanyama for a season in this formation, he had his best season for us and the overall play was very good. Sadly that is getting further and further away as time goes on.

Rose was okay, bit of a mixed bag, He threatened well down the flank and linked nicely with Son, he was fouled (and it was a foul) for the penalty and he showed the energy and pace we'd have associated with him two years ago. He also committed too many fouls, lost concentration a few times and was inconsistent with tracking back.

Moura as ever showed a lot of endeavour, pace and positivity, but nothing overly came off for him today and the execution wasn't there for the most part. However, his determination in getting up (when he should have had a penalty) and getting the ball out to Trippier in the build up to Kane's first was wonderful, and he worked very hard tracking back.

Son looked threatening when we broke and his link up with Rose leading to the penalty was very good, but most of his decisions were poor and his failure to make the most of promising situations was frustrating. He also flitted in and out of the game, he should take note from his Brazilian friend on the opposite flank.

Kane did tire as the game wore on, but at least it was justified after putting in a lot of effort rather than the statuesque zombie we have seen for most of the season. He involvement was far better, his hold up play was good generally and he linked things nicely. He also got into threatening situations far more than he has been and after not taking a couple of early chances, still had the heart and confidence to rise beautifully for an expert header before tucking away his penalty with his usual aplomb.

Winks was a bit hit and miss as you'd expect from a guy coming back from injury and getting irregular game time. However, there was positivity about his play, turning well and driving forward with the ball a few times and being a bit more progressive with his passing than usual. He did have a couple of sloppy moments though and he wasn't particularly robust off the ball.

Wanyama continues to be pedestrian, but until he gets a run of games it's impossible to know whether he's regressed or whether he's just suffering from irregular playing time and lack of match fitness. With Vertonghen's injury, if Pochettino insists on a three man defence, we might finally find out.

Sissoko had very little time to run in straight lines.

I'm unimpressed with our manager more than our players today. He again picks a new formation and selection despite only 4231 having looked even remotely cohesive this season, he doesn't pick Lamela who has been our best AM this season despite having the least pitch time, and he didn't address the issues our formation was clearly causing at any point in the match. If he utilises this formation and tactic against any side who are remotely slicker in their movement than Huddersfield, we're fucked.
 

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,701
25,259
We have injuries and a massive game Wednesday... The players played out a very professional result without risking more injuries
Like i said before, clueless not thought out post by you
A good result but the performance was far from professional under the circumstances. To be professional in holding back in anticipation of a bigger game to come means, that you dont misplace most of your passes, you dont lack composure and you control the game. We allowed them to play to their very limited capabilities where for once they did not park a bus, even when it was scoreless. Result aside can you honestly say we were in control? If you honestly think so then apart from me being clueless, you are deluded
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,960
71,377
Gazzaniga - 7
Trippier - 3.5
Sanchez - 6
Toby - 6
Verts - 6
Rose - 6
Dier - 3 first half; 5 2nd half in the back 3
Dembele - 3
Lucas - 5
Son - 5
Kane - 7

Wanyama - 4
Winks - 6
Sissoko - NET

Poor, abject performance where the scoreline flattered us greatly but hey, 3 points is 3 points. Improved ever so slightly in the 2nd half after the changes but still not close to good. Dier, Trippier and Dembele(first half) were poor. Wanyama looked, well, pedestrian after coming on for the 2nd half. However, Winks was okay in the 2nd half. Kane MOM for the goals.
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,890
130,524
Poor, abject performance where the scoreline flattered us greatly
We had at least 3 clear cut chances apart from the goal and Huddersfield created nothing of note so I can't see how the scoreline flattered us.
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
I think we coasted it as much as we possibly could today. Huddersfield never let up the whole game worked their socks off. I was convinced they’d tire but they didn’t. Saying that I never really felt like they were gonna score and felt like we would every time we broke forward. Wasnt pretty but wins against Cardiff and West Ham will give us our best ever start under poch so cant really grumble right now.
 

Phomesy

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
9,188
14,102
Seven games. Five away. Five wins. Actually a good start to the season, especially when we doesn't play well.

Yeah it helps that we are winning - not drawing - even when not playing particularly well.
 

SirNiNyHotspur

23 Years of Property, Concerts, Karts & Losing
Apr 27, 2004
3,127
6,761
Played crap and won, sign of a good team I hear, that said would be nice to play well and win occasionally too. Thought defence done well, midfield poor, especially Dire, and forwards way too wasteful, with Huddersfield’s defence we could have got a cricket score if we were up for it, and Pawson is one shockingly shit referee bringing referee shitness to new depths week after week.
 

spurious1

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
994
848
I was happy with it (without being happy with it, watching it). Obviously we set out to play counter-attacking anti-football. I say that in the sense that a counter attacking game depends on your opponents making mistakes, rather than you being proactive. Personally I don't like the style for that reason, but certainly it works well, especially against error-prone opposition. Some teams play that way all the time, and some people apparently think it's beautiful, so who am I to say? Anyhow results wise, it worked didn't it?

Just a word for Gazza. I suppose he didn't think he'd be playing a minute of competitive football this year. But he's come in and looked like he belonged there the whole time. That's quite something really, in what is the most psychologically challenging role on the pitch.
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,170
There was an Eriksen-shaped hole in the midfield. That was the main problem.

The defence was really solid today, winning and heading away countless aerial balls, especially Sanchez. The wing-backs were OK, Rose the better, but without doing anything brilliant except for Trippier's assist, which was, well, what Trippier does.

On occasions when we could keep the ball for long enough to mount a break, the front three looked hungry and quick, if somewhat uncoordinated at times (Son mainly).

But Dier had one of his brainless-passing games, steering the ball directly to an opponent several times when under no real pressure. Winks was OK, but still needs to get his fine touch back. And Dembélé was competent but uninspired. And there was no Eriksen, haring around, pressing, dropping back when required, making the link and joining the attack.

The result was a lot of Huddersfield pressure, ball-winning and harrying that added up to very little, because they have no one with any craft or creativity in the final third. Pritchard was OK, but seems to have lost whatever magic he had as a young player. Perhaps he's better than that and just has no one to be creative for. They're well-drilled in midfield, naive in defence and toothless at the front - pretty much the opposite of us today.

We did the job: scored a couple of goals through quality and then slammed the door. Can't decide between Kane & Sanchez for man of the match.

P.S. Gazzaniga was good again. Pochettino's patience with young players is an underrated trait. He knows when to introduce them. Many fans think he brings in young talent too late, but the results suggest otherwise. Gazzaniga looks like a good premiership goalkeeper now.
Sanchez is our best defender in the air
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,562
I thought that was an exceptionally scrappy game today. Some of that was due to other factors - the heavy wind for instance, and it being an away game where you expect the opposition (with the crowd roaring them on) to have a go at certain points - but a lot of it was down to silly little errors and sloppy/inaccurate play by ourselves. There didn't seem to be any great flow, there were a lot of fouls and setpieces puncturing the game, and we didn't enjoy really any sustained control or manage to string a great deal of passes together.

Usually if a game was panning out like this then any result gained would have been a torturous effort, however in this one it really wasn't. Defensively, individually and as a unit, we stood up well today to the limited huff and puff that Huddersfield offered, and then what they did defensively just made it far too easy for us. Last season they defended this naively against us, and it was the same today. Often getting caught one for one at the back, a really limited stand-off press, and bad disorganisation that led to the simplest balls over the top causing them chaos and being exploited.

If we'd been anywhere near our best I think we absolutely wallop them, some of their defending deserved it. However for the most part, disappointingly we were really wasteful in the final third. Poor touches, poor finishing, poor decision making, all were evident today and that kept the score down. Thankfully it was early in the game when a good cross (Trippier) was met by a good header (Kane), and then we were finally awarded a penalty after running rings round them down the flanks/channels for the umpteenth time, and so we weren't in a situation where things got desperate and our misfiring didn't cost us.

Also I have to say that I'm still not liking our press, our shape, our compactness, the midfield (with and without the ball)..... All of it looks off, you cant really dig out individuals, as a collective it just isn't quite happening to the high standards that have been set previously and that we're accustomed to. Work to be done in this aspect still, three points today or not.

Gazzaniga - Did his work competently when called upon. All you ask of him.

Alderweireld - Couple of iffy bits of play at times, but mostly very solid and defended well.

Sanchez - Much better game today. Defended our box well.

Vertonghen - Ok before going off.

Trippier - Good cross for the goal. Defended solidly enough.

Rose - Very good first hour, towards the end had yet another spell where he seemed to get a bit overconfident more than anything, think it was too easy, and lose a bit of focus.

Dier - Slightly better when he went into centre back, but not a great game.

Dembele - Meh.

Moura - Worked hard as usual, few good bits of individual play but a bit wasteful..... As I said the other day though, a lot of what he does is very individual though, he doesn't do much linking up with others and appear on their wavelength.

Son - Not great. Very wasteful.

Kane - Looked better up against (probably) the worst defensive outfit in the league. At least put himself about a bit. And did score a good header and emphatic penalty...... But lets be honest, he too was also wasteful though the majority of the time in the final third.


Subs:
Winks - Meh. Too may fouls.

Wanyama - Did ok.

Sissoko - n/a.
 
Last edited:

wirE

I'm a well-known member
Sep 27, 2005
4,676
5,582
Glad to see Kane bagging a couple of goals. Good on Moura getting back on his feet and passing the ball. Any news of Jan?
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
I mentioned this int he match thread but I think once we went 2-0 up we coasted along particularly in the second half with the Barca game in mind. No point in stretching yourselves when the game was in the bag, which it was once half time was reached

I dont really have a star man but Kane because he got the two but think defensively we were good especially with their barrage of set pieces and throw ins.
 

DannyNZ

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2017
1,798
4,889
Tough game to pick a motm but give it to Gazza for couple of saves and a solid game. Really don’t like the formation with 3 centre backs with effectively 2 shielding midfielders.

Play through the middle of the park is pedestrian and sloppy with Dier either giving possession away or hiding.

Not much came off for Moura but his pace and tenacity made a difference.

Rose put in a good shift which was pleasing given how out of form Davies is currently.

Thought Winks first 10 minutes were bright and he was going to pull that midfield together but it didn’t last.

All in all a tough watch where it is hard to see any real improvement in our performances but at least it was a comfortable away win.
 

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,701
25,259
P.S. Gazzaniga was good again. Pochettino's patience with young players is an underrated trait. He knows when to introduce them. Many fans think he brings in young talent too late, but the results suggest otherwise. Gazzaniga looks like a good premiership goalkeeper now.
He playing Gazzaniga was almost serendipitous. Poch had no choice but to play him as both Lloris and Vorm were injured. Giving him credit for some tactical or master stroke playing Gazzaniga is being very generous
 

davidmatzdorf

Front Page Gadfly
Jun 7, 2004
18,106
45,030
That's not what I said, is it? I wasn't praising Pochettino for playing him now. I was praising him for not playing him before.

Gazzaniga wasn't very good when he arrived. Now he is.
 

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,701
25,259
That's not what I said, is it? I wasn't praising Pochettino for playing him now. I was praising him for not playing him before.

Gazzaniga wasn't very good when he arrived. Now he is.
I stand corrected Sir. I misunderstood. I now agree with you!!
 

SpursSince1980

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2011
4,754
14,485
Defense - 9
Midfield- 4
Attack - 6

Shout out to Dier for being exceptionally crap today in midfield. Lived up to his name. But the switch to the back worked. Maybe one day both him and Poch will see what everyone in the world can see... he is a decent defender. A semi-decent midfielder.
 

mano-obe

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,282
7,556
I voted Rose. The only player who can get booed by 19 other teams fans and he loves it
 

ralvy

AVB my love
Jun 26, 2012
2,511
4,628
Huddersfield didn't have a clear chance the entire game what are you on about. Yes they hit the bar but that was more a great volley than an obvious opportunity.

And how the fuck was it 'gutless'? They had about 20 long throws into our box and we won every header.

You do realize during the opening five minutes of the match the referee denied Huddersfield a very clear chance by not signaling foul on that Lucas Moura tackle very near our penalty area, don't you? While half an hour later, the referee did gave us a veeeery generous penalty call.

Also, with all due respect, to say that ball that hit the bar wasn't a clear chance is fucking insane. Huddersfield player made contact with the ball while being totally unmarked inside our own penalty box. Is beyond me how anyone can conclude that wasn't a clear chance.

Make no mistake, the referee was a big reason of why we ended up taking the three points today without much trouble.
 
Last edited:

dannythomas

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2004
3,758
2,813
There have been a number of posts critical of the 3-4-3 formation. I believe this was the first time this season that Trippier and Rose have played together as wing backs. They are both better playing there than as full backs in a 4 . In the absence of Eriksen we had to create in a different way and both goals came through them. I thought our back 3 also did very well and Dier is way better there than repeatedly giving the ball away in midfield.

Wanyama got some more much needed minutes and I thought did well.Gazza gave a sound goalkeeping display and Kane looked more like his old self.

Lucas, Son , Dembele and Winks were all pretty average without being terrible.

But on the whole more pluses than minuses but with the obvious rider that Huddersfield are not Barcelona.
 
Top