The ITK Discussion Thread - FOR ITK DISCUSSION ONLY - 28th January 2022

[chrissivad]

Thought GLC wanted Villarreal, and Bryan was Sevilla

Valencia... Not Villarreal
That's the latest that I have seen posted

 

[Timberwolf]

Thought GLC wanted Villarreal, and Bryan was Sevilla

Bryan to Valencia, no?

I wonder if on a Sevilla forum there are posters confusing us, Villa and Everton right now.

 

[rawhide]

Bryan to Valencia, no?

I wonder if on a Sevilla forum there are posters confusing us, Villa and Everton right now.

Yep, tried to edit it quickly, but you & Chris both quoted my error.

 

[ButchCassidy]

That's rules for domestic loans.
I can't see anything for international loans

We can definitely loan two players from the same international side, because we currently have two players on loan from Atalanta.

 

[chrissivad]

Yep, tried to edit it quickly, but you & Chris both quoted my error.

I got the team wrong

 

[rawhide]

I got the team wrong

So did I!

 

[elfy]

What we think the rules are (and this is going to be relevant tomorrow)...

We can only loan 2 players from another premier league club at any one time (we have 0).
We can only loan 4 players in total (from any Association) in a single season (we have 2, hopefully to be 3 shortly).

So we have 2 loan spots this season open, 1 if we get Kulusevski. It doesn't matter if it's prem or international as we're under the 2 prem loans cap.

I may be wrong, but is there not a limit to the number of loan players named in the match day squad?

I tried googling but can't find an answer, something in the back of my head says 5.

So, if we have 6 players on loan, one cannot be named in starting 11 or bench.

Or, I could have completely imagined that and be totally wrong!

 

[sausage]

That's rules for domestic loans.
I can't see anything for international loans

Seems you're right. Fulham apparently had 7 on loan last season and they all were in the squad against Sheffield United
(https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/56033692)

Areola - PSG, Anderson- Lyon, Aina - Torino, Maja - Bordeaux, Loftus Cheek - Chelsea, Lemina - Southampton, Lookman - RB Leipzig

All loans in.

 

[Lea]

Again nothing

I'll say it again it's nothing to do with Levy other than signing off at the end.

Do they listen, not in the slightest ? who they will hate instead

 

[Matthew]

Positive news from trix whxuh is great, hiepfully we get some early links tomorrow morning for some exciting players!

 

[dagraham]

Just to add once the loan is done the obligation/option can be added after the window shuts if need be.

That’s interesting. I knew deals could be completed subject to a medical after the deadline, but always presumed the actual agreement between parties had to be fully in place.

 

[Fatcat]

Think the fifa ruling on loans is 8 in, but don't know if football associations have there own rules, maybe own league ones as Rob posted

 

[Yiddo100]

Nothing says transfer window more than discussing the loan rules, which nobody can ever seem to fathom

 

[dagraham]

Positive news from trix whxuh is great, hiepfully we get some early links tomorrow morning for some exciting players!

Seems very unlikely, but I really hope if a surprise loan deal happens that it’s a CF.

 

[paulcumpstone]

Interesting the itk is still saying 3 in. As we dont really know much about who the 3rd could be.

 

[Stoof]

That’s interesting. I knew deals could be completed subject to a medical after the deadline, but always presumed the actual agreement between parties had to be fully in place.

It would be a new agreement.

 

[worcestersauce]

I appreciate the loan rules information however what I really care about is that we've made one of our incomings a permanent to leave us the additional loan space.
We wouldn't be doing that if we'd gone home and put our feet up all business done. ?

 

[tommyt]

Crazy to think of the amount of action possibly taking place tomorrow. Should be fun!!

 

[dagraham]

It would be a new agreement.

Yeah, thinking about it the initial agreement for the transfer of the players registration would have already been satisfied. So any subsequent changes for a new agreement fall outside of the window. Makes sense.

 

[wrd]

I'm excited for tomorrow, I expected today to be when all the news starts filtering out but it's still so tight lipped