What Our Opponents' Fans Are Saying About Us 21/22

[allatsea]

The best is spurs win because [their players] score goals. What team doesn’t?

I thought you needed to score goals to win otherwise you would draw or lose. Have I got that wrong ?

 

[double0]

Pep has titles at the biggest and richest clubs but has failed at BM and ManC in the CL. For an example Put Poch where Peps been I'm pretty sure the results would be similar / same

Conte along with Mourinho are in the elite managers club and for Arsenal fans not admitting his status shows their lack of awareness and jealousy / bitterness

 

[Gb160]

Fucking love that Arsenal fans are still sniping at each other.

 

[Spriggan]

Fucking love that Arsenal fans are still sniping at each other.

Long may it continue

 

[topper]

Fucking love that Arsenal fans are still sniping at each other.

Thank the Lord we don’t

 

[Gb160]

Thank the Lord we don’t

It’s all high fives and arse slaps on SC !

 

[dannyo]

I'm trying to work out how their logic works when they think that they can discredit Conte's titles because he did it at Juventus, yet at the same time call Nagelsmann, Flick, Allegri and Ten Hag better.

Flick and Nagelsmann working in a one team league. Allegri is credited when he came in straight after Conte? Ten Hag had Ajax playing some amazing football, but the hype around him before he's even managed a game for UTD is maddening.

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the football that those coaches have their teams play, but then I enjoy Conte ball too. Just because he knows when to admit that the other team are better and we have to counter attack does not make him a defensive/boring coach. If we'd broken through Liverpool's high line as many times as we should have (Hojbjerg, Kane and Deki all missed easy passses for Son), then would world class Klopp have been lauded for sticking to his principles?

There’s often no logic to jealousy. I’ll take the ‘Italian Tony Pulis’ any day of the week. I wonder if they read their own posts and cringe? So embarrassing

 

[Trix]

Thank the Lord we don’t

Shut it knob head.

 

[Jgplk1]

Blue Moon

• I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending
• Quite the opposite, they will be praised for it
• expand...interesting...would that be the Ton-fifty that they were begging off us for Kane?...I get the impression that they need to balance the books.
• Exactly, I doubt it will be spent in the transfer market
• expand...How is it possible within FFP?
• will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
• It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
• So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?
• Because it doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.
• Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?
• They could pay off debts which were incurring interest.
• They could use it for thing which don't come under ffp like stadium improvements.
• Levy making promises to a manager again and likely to not deliver again.
• Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
• Borrowings from owners are on the balance sheet, not subject ffp. You can use them for transfers. See Chelsea. Mansour lent us about £750m, which he swapped for equity.
• Allows them to bring in a handful of good but not great players, leading to unrealistic offseason expectations which they will predictably fail to meet on their way to sacking their manager by Christmas, finishing trophy-less, and landing somewhere between 4th-8th in the tableThe Spurs way
• expand...We know how this plays out. Levy to selling club July 1st "I know you want 50M but I'll give you 25M". Selling Club "No, its 50M" Levy to selling club Sept 1st - day the transfer window closes "Ok, make it 27.5M". Sept 2nd Conte quits
• Tots 150 mil to spend,overwhelmingly positive reaction in the media.City spend 51 mil on Haarland,ruining football.
• Were they not in for Diaz for £80 million and he ended up for Liverpool for half that figure? If that’s their business acumen I don’t see this money they have invested going very far on helping them improve.
• If this were City, it would be 'financial doping'. As it's not, it's OK.
• how much do they owe on the ground?
• Spuds will be rinsed, Levy won’t be able to handle it. As well as us strengthening, the Rags will be paying big bucks to rebuild along with the Chavs who have been promised £175m per season by the new owners. Add in Arsenal, Newcastle, Real Madrid, Barca, PSG and others £150m won’t get them far and they have to cough up for Becantour and the Kuve fella. Enjoy the 4th place Spuds with the CL participation, the one good thing for them is they’ll probably avoid Atletico as both will end up in Pot 2 of the CL.
• Hope they get rinsed for 3 mediocre players the twats

 

[Wick3d]

Blue Moon

• I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending
• Quite the opposite, they will be praised for it
• expand...interesting...would that be the Ton-fifty that they were begging off us for Kane?...I get the impression that they need to balance the books.
• Exactly, I doubt it will be spent in the transfer market
• expand...How is it possible within FFP?
• will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
• It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
• So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?
• Because it doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.
• Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?
• They could pay off debts which were incurring interest.
• They could use it for thing which don't come under ffp like stadium improvements.
• Levy making promises to a manager again and likely to not deliver again.
• Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
• Borrowings from owners are on the balance sheet, not subject ffp. You can use them for transfers. See Chelsea. Mansour lent us about £750m, which he swapped for equity.
• Allows them to bring in a handful of good but not great players, leading to unrealistic offseason expectations which they will predictably fail to meet on their way to sacking their manager by Christmas, finishing trophy-less, and landing somewhere between 4th-8th in the tableThe Spurs way
• expand...We know how this plays out. Levy to selling club July 1st "I know you want 50M but I'll give you 25M". Selling Club "No, its 50M" Levy to selling club Sept 1st - day the transfer window closes "Ok, make it 27.5M". Sept 2nd Conte quits
• Tots 150 mil to spend,overwhelmingly positive reaction in the media.City spend 51 mil on Haarland,ruining football.
• Were they not in for Diaz for £80 million and he ended up for Liverpool for half that figure? If that’s their business acumen I don’t see this money they have invested going very far on helping them improve.
• If this were City, it would be 'financial doping'. As it's not, it's OK.
• how much do they owe on the ground?
• Spuds will be rinsed, Levy won’t be able to handle it. As well as us strengthening, the Rags will be paying big bucks to rebuild along with the Chavs who have been promised £175m per season by the new owners. Add in Arsenal, Newcastle, Real Madrid, Barca, PSG and others £150m won’t get them far and they have to cough up for Becantour and the Kuve fella. Enjoy the 4th place Spuds with the CL participation, the one good thing for them is they’ll probably avoid Atletico as both will end up in Pot 2 of the CL.
• Hope they get rinsed for 3 mediocre players the twats

Criticising us for FFP? Are these dopes for real?

 

[bigpalacios]

City fans are up there with the dumbest on the planet

 

[thekneaf]

Blue Moon

• I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending
• Quite the opposite, they will be praised for it
• expand...interesting...would that be the Ton-fifty that they were begging off us for Kane?...I get the impression that they need to balance the books.
• Exactly, I doubt it will be spent in the transfer market
• expand...How is it possible within FFP?
• will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
• It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
• So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?
• Because it doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.
• Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?
• They could pay off debts which were incurring interest.
• They could use it for thing which don't come under ffp like stadium improvements.
• Levy making promises to a manager again and likely to not deliver again.
• Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
• Borrowings from owners are on the balance sheet, not subject ffp. You can use them for transfers. See Chelsea. Mansour lent us about £750m, which he swapped for equity.
• Allows them to bring in a handful of good but not great players, leading to unrealistic offseason expectations which they will predictably fail to meet on their way to sacking their manager by Christmas, finishing trophy-less, and landing somewhere between 4th-8th in the tableThe Spurs way
• expand...We know how this plays out. Levy to selling club July 1st "I know you want 50M but I'll give you 25M". Selling Club "No, its 50M" Levy to selling club Sept 1st - day the transfer window closes "Ok, make it 27.5M". Sept 2nd Conte quits
• Tots 150 mil to spend,overwhelmingly positive reaction in the media.City spend 51 mil on Haarland,ruining football.
• Were they not in for Diaz for £80 million and he ended up for Liverpool for half that figure? If that’s their business acumen I don’t see this money they have invested going very far on helping them improve.
• If this were City, it would be 'financial doping'. As it's not, it's OK.
• how much do they owe on the ground?
• Spuds will be rinsed, Levy won’t be able to handle it. As well as us strengthening, the Rags will be paying big bucks to rebuild along with the Chavs who have been promised £175m per season by the new owners. Add in Arsenal, Newcastle, Real Madrid, Barca, PSG and others £150m won’t get them far and they have to cough up for Becantour and the Kuve fella. Enjoy the 4th place Spuds with the CL participation, the one good thing for them is they’ll probably avoid Atletico as both will end up in Pot 2 of the CL.
• Hope they get rinsed for 3 mediocre players the twats

Worrying about ffp with relation to our potential spending. Lol

 

[Dov67]

Blue Moon

• I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending
• Quite the opposite, they will be praised for it
• expand...interesting...would that be the Ton-fifty that they were begging off us for Kane?...I get the impression that they need to balance the books.
• Exactly, I doubt it will be spent in the transfer market
• expand...How is it possible within FFP?
• will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
• It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
• So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?
• Because it doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.
• Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?
• They could pay off debts which were incurring interest.
• They could use it for thing which don't come under ffp like stadium improvements.
• Levy making promises to a manager again and likely to not deliver again.
• Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
• Borrowings from owners are on the balance sheet, not subject ffp. You can use them for transfers. See Chelsea. Mansour lent us about £750m, which he swapped for equity.
• Allows them to bring in a handful of good but not great players, leading to unrealistic offseason expectations which they will predictably fail to meet on their way to sacking their manager by Christmas, finishing trophy-less, and landing somewhere between 4th-8th in the tableThe Spurs way
• expand...We know how this plays out. Levy to selling club July 1st "I know you want 50M but I'll give you 25M". Selling Club "No, its 50M" Levy to selling club Sept 1st - day the transfer window closes "Ok, make it 27.5M". Sept 2nd Conte quits
• Tots 150 mil to spend,overwhelmingly positive reaction in the media.City spend 51 mil on Haarland,ruining football.
• Were they not in for Diaz for £80 million and he ended up for Liverpool for half that figure? If that’s their business acumen I don’t see this money they have invested going very far on helping them improve.
• If this were City, it would be 'financial doping'. As it's not, it's OK.
• how much do they owe on the ground?
• Spuds will be rinsed, Levy won’t be able to handle it. As well as us strengthening, the Rags will be paying big bucks to rebuild along with the Chavs who have been promised £175m per season by the new owners. Add in Arsenal, Newcastle, Real Madrid, Barca, PSG and others £150m won’t get them far and they have to cough up for Becantour and the Kuve fella. Enjoy the 4th place Spuds with the CL participation, the one good thing for them is they’ll probably avoid Atletico as both will end up in Pot 2 of the CL.
• Hope they get rinsed for 3 mediocre players the twats

The lack of self awareness and financia knowledge on display here takes one’s breath away

 

[PCozzie]

Blue Moon

• I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending
• Quite the opposite, they will be praised for it
• expand...interesting...would that be the Ton-fifty that they were begging off us for Kane?...I get the impression that they need to balance the books.
• Exactly, I doubt it will be spent in the transfer market
• expand...How is it possible within FFP?
• will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
• It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
• So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?
• Because it doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.
• Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?
• They could pay off debts which were incurring interest.
• They could use it for thing which don't come under ffp like stadium improvements.
• Levy making promises to a manager again and likely to not deliver again.
• Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
• Borrowings from owners are on the balance sheet, not subject ffp. You can use them for transfers. See Chelsea. Mansour lent us about £750m, which he swapped for equity.
• Allows them to bring in a handful of good but not great players, leading to unrealistic offseason expectations which they will predictably fail to meet on their way to sacking their manager by Christmas, finishing trophy-less, and landing somewhere between 4th-8th in the tableThe Spurs way
• expand...We know how this plays out. Levy to selling club July 1st "I know you want 50M but I'll give you 25M". Selling Club "No, its 50M" Levy to selling club Sept 1st - day the transfer window closes "Ok, make it 27.5M". Sept 2nd Conte quits
• Tots 150 mil to spend,overwhelmingly positive reaction in the media.City spend 51 mil on Haarland,ruining football.
• Were they not in for Diaz for £80 million and he ended up for Liverpool for half that figure? If that’s their business acumen I don’t see this money they have invested going very far on helping them improve.
• If this were City, it would be 'financial doping'. As it's not, it's OK.
• how much do they owe on the ground?
• Spuds will be rinsed, Levy won’t be able to handle it. As well as us strengthening, the Rags will be paying big bucks to rebuild along with the Chavs who have been promised £175m per season by the new owners. Add in Arsenal, Newcastle, Real Madrid, Barca, PSG and others £150m won’t get them far and they have to cough up for Becantour and the Kuve fella. Enjoy the 4th place Spuds with the CL participation, the one good thing for them is they’ll probably avoid Atletico as both will end up in Pot 2 of the CL.
• Hope they get rinsed for 3 mediocre players the twats

Show us on the doll where Tottenham hurt you Man City.

 

[Tucker]

Criticising us for FFP? Are these dopes for real?

Couldn’t make it up could you.

 

[Scot-Spur]

That was a tough read, some people are ridiculously stupid or delusional.

 

[jurgen11]

Arsenal Mania

• main difference between Sp**s and us they actually have 2 goal scorers in Son and Kane specificly on the end of the season our goals were not coming though.
• Still think we are on the right track but we need a quality injection.
• Main difference is Sp**s got a top 5 manager in the world and we got Pub League Mik. We win one more match in that 3 straight losses at end of season and we breeze to CL.
• The Pub manager you calling got us most wins in league since Wenger was in charge
• Italian Mourinho is not even top 5 in the PL
• Italian Mourinho coached the pants off pub league Mik
• Sp**s score a ton more goals under Conte than we do, Pub league Mike’s teams score only in matches that don’t matter
• Yawn, am I supposed to be impressed that a team with Kane and Son score "a lot" of goals?
• Kane had less goals and provided less assists than last season, Italian Mourinho must be truly world-class to accomplish such a feat ?
• Lmao, Italian Mourinho came to Sp*rs after 9 league games, but if you want to make pathetic excuses I suppose you can somehow equate that with half the season. Guy lost to the lowest ranked team in the Conference league and exited in the group stages, I'm supposed to cream my pants over what he can do in Europe next year?
• Winners with multiple league championships playing in the CL after they inherited a free falling team don’t need excuses. Losers who have Cedric and Holding decide our CL failure after 280 million should be packing Oranges for the girls at the park and not be destroying the Arsenal brand
• Then why are you making them for him?
• A manager who has spent 2 decades and has one a majority of his league championships at a dominant Juventus. At the time barely more challenging than winning the league with PSG.Are you going to keep licking his boots when he has his inevitable meltdown and leaves? He's already had a few mini-meltdowns.
• Lol Conte with all his faults is about 100 times as accomplished as Arteta and he publicly clowned him and Arteta choked
• I would take any of the top managers in the league over Arteta; Arteta isn’t even good enough to be in the second tier of managers in division, he isn’t even Moyes, Potter, or Rodgers. Comparing Arteta to Conte is like comparing a mule to a Championship winning race horse. Between Sp**s and Arsenal one team has a fraud the other has a proven winner.
• If Arteta is as sh*t as you say isn’t it a bit embarrassing that Conte a supposed "top 5 in the world" needs to be compared with Arteta to look good?
• Conte won the League with Inter they hadn’t won it in many years. Same with Juve, he started Juve’s best championship period in club history. if he isn’t top 5 he is top 10, and all his teams played more watchable football than the king of Joseball 2.0 Arteta.
• you attack Conte to deflect attention from the proven failure we have managing our club.
• it's a long term project. Sp**s only getting to top 4 because of Son & Kane goals.
• I just find it odd you attack Conte for boring football but Arteta plays even more boring football and manages your team. But beyond that my statement isn’t odd, if Conte is not top 5 he certainly is top 10. If my statement is so out of norm name 10 better managers then
• Pep, Klopp, Tuchel, Simeone, Ten Hag, Ancelotti, Zidane, Allegri, Nagelsmann, Flick. Not particularly hard and I don't even rate a bunch of those super-highly either
• Control the game? Lol is that would we did against Newcastle. Conte added a quality starter in January took a floundering team to CL, what did Tets do? So Conte stinks for succeeding in 6 months to do what Arteta failed to in 2 and half years?
• Shots is what Arteta's tactics lacks. Shots is what granit Xhaka fails. Cumshots is what Artetasexual likes!
• Like Arteta is the worst manager in the league but finished just 2 points off the Elite Conte.
• Think it’s the fact that Conte took over Sp**s when they were 8th and we were 4th. We had games in hands as well. Its not rocket science is it.
• Conte beat him this season, we just have to admit it.Up to Mikel and Arsenal now, to try and get the better of Sp**s next season.
• We went 21 seasons finishing above them, now it's 6 in a row for them...need to end their run very soon!
• It's really sad how the Cult of Contesexuals are trying to convince others that Mourinhoball 2.0 coachee by a man with a mediocre domestoc record and a horrendous European record is the greatest thing to ever happen to modern football.
• calling Italian Tony Pulis a top 5 in the world is laughable.
• Tottenham has finished 6 years ahead of us. 3 Sp**s managers finished ahead of Arteta. It’s like beating the disabled kid in school in foot race, Arteta is not a PL manager
• Tuchel, Klopp and the others have an almost equal or better domestic record to 2 decades Conte but trounce him in Europe and the great majority of them do it while playing better football, pathetic

Yawn, am I supposed to be impressed that a team with Kane and Son score "a lot" of goals? - Yes you are you ignorant fuckstick

 

[jurgen11]

ConteSexuals

they really are idiots, but funny ones

Sam Allarbisexuals ?

 

[SpartanSpur]

City fans are up there with the dumbest on the planet

That was genuinely painful to read. At least their oil/blood drenched club gives them plenty of happy time I guess.

Quite amusing how much they hate little old Tottenham because we dare to beat them more regularly than most.

 

[kaz Hirai]

dumb and salty because they feel other fans and the press/media dont respect their achievements.

for any lurking city fans It's no conspiracy, no one cares what city wins, it's a cartoon club. The fact that you havent won the CL after giving pep ONE BILLION POUNDS Just further highlights your nonsense smoke and mirror show