What's new

What Our Opponents' Fans Are Saying About Us 21/22

Status
Not open for further replies.

djhotspur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2021
6,867
15,991
Really helpful explanation. It explained something that I’ve been trying to get my head around at work for a while. Doesn’t the transfer price of assets have to be fair though? I.e, doesn’t the coffee and the license fee have to be assessed as being realistic or ‘market value’?
Yes it does. As I said in the my previous comments that explanation is based upon the way things were done 10 years ago. But it was a good way of explaining things so people can understand.
 

Serpico

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2019
3,072
4,561
Few days ago

Last minute equaliser against Tottenham women.

West Ham's Kate Longhurst said , You want to score against teams you don't like, and that's what I managed to do."

Silly mooo.
 
Last edited:

Matrix

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,924
5,680
Few days ago

Last minute equaliser against Tottenham women.

West Ham's Kate Longhurst said , You want to score against teams you don't like, and that's what I managed to do."

Silly mooo.
I watched this game, we were dominant but the striker is utter shite. A half decent striker and we could have won by 2/3 goals. Shame.
 

robbiedee

Mama said knock you out
Jul 6, 2012
2,724
7,552
not much being said on 'Foxes talk' apart from them guessing their own starting line up...

...and this dream...

I had a dream Tanganga handballs the ball on the line and gets sent off. Going to be a good day boys. I ****ing detest these Pigeon twats, let’s **** them up.
 

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
Foxes Talk:

Lots of derogatory comments about Kane's face, nose, mouth. Wishing him Covid, etc etc. Some very sad individuals on there. Not noticed these types of comments on Arsemania or other forums where they clearly don't like him but tend to begrudgingly respect Kane rather than drop to this level of moronic comments.

------------

Let's go... We haven't played a league game since 28 December against Liverpool. That's 23 days.

Think we'll be rusty, but counter that with the fact we have some key players back and more options to choose from. Spurs missing Son means it's a good time to play them. Hope their game against Arsenal goes ahead as that's in doubt.

Postponed. Weather set to be 7 celsius which as we all know are valid grounds for postponement.

Harry Kane vs Hamza ..Postpone please.

They are going to rename Andrew ''Tottenham'' as neither have any titles :cautious:

I think we’ll win this. Despite how poor we’ve been this season, we are not too far off top 6 and not as far as I thought we would be from the top 4. Start of the season on Thursday. Let’s go on a run.

Kane - couldn’t score for us, but by Christ he likes to score against us. Tw@t.

Last seasons home loss to dump us out of the CL places is worth 10 losses imo. We’ve played worse defensive lines this season and got results. How did we fvck that up so badly? Hurts a lot

The Premier League are considering a request from the LCFC stadium announcer to postpone tomorrow nights game as “it’s going to be a bit nippy”.

So only : Vardy, Evans, Ricardo, Timmy Chestnuts, Wes, Wilf, Kelechi, Big Dan and Mendy out. Game off then.

Sit back- frustrate -quick breaks and we should be OK.

How many will that norris score for them tomorrow? When was the last time we played them at home and he didn't score? Was it when he actually played for us on loan?

It a worry, I would like to think there has to be a game he doesn't score against us at some point.

He didn't score against us in out title winning season.

The only way to win is to try and out score them so I think we will go all out attack.

Isn’t that how the game works anyway? Although Spurs haven’t dropped many points under Conte, they have not looked particularly great, particularly with Son missing.

Nah basically I mean they are likely to score a few so can’t see us getting a 1 or 2 nil. We need 3 or 4 to win.

Daka will be all over Sanchez, always looks a bit of a bombscare when I've seen him. I don't think there is anything to be afraid of, other than Kane, defenders aren't the best and they have little creativity in midfield.

Don't you just know that Kane is going to score the winner and that Conté will get so excited he will nearly wet himself. Yuno I really love to see a bit of enthusiasm - but that man takes it to stupid extremes - bl**dy ridiculous - his reactions are puerile, over-the-top and massively annoying.
 

Stuart Leathercock

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
522
1,422
The debt from Roman's financing is sat in the holding company, so whilst it doesn't directly show under the club, it is still there in the background and carried by the club.........I've no idea why Swiss Ramble haven't shown it (possibly because Chelsea don't show it in their accounts and he wants to be directly comparable for consistency across clubs).
It is because, in effect, Roman's has transferred money from his left pocket to his right pocket. The debt of one entity solely owned by Roman Abramovich, is to another entity solely owned by Roman Abramovich. Of course Abramovich could choose to weaken the valuation of one of those companies to improve the valuation of the other company (which I think is used soley to lend money to Chelsea FC) but doing that doesn't really make any financial sense.

If ENIC owned 100% of Spurs, then set up a new company and that company lent THFC £820m at zero interest and with no agreed payment terms so that THFC could pay off its existing interest bearing loans then THFC would also be considered debt free. In effect the football club then has no actual debt and the money provided is just taken back in the proceeds of any sale. The Forbes valuations of THFC and Chelsea largely reflect this, being £1.65b and £2.5b respectively. At present if somebody buys Spurs at Forbes' valuation then ENIC get £1.65b (kerching!) and the new owner gets to own THFC football club who still have £820m of debt in place via interest bearing loans. Conversely if somebody buys Chelsea at Forbes' valuation then Roman Abramovic gets £2.5b, allowing him to get back the £1.5b that he has loaned the company as well as £1b on top, meanwhile the new Chelsea owner takes on a business with zero debt).
 
Last edited:
Jan 28, 2011
5,721
79,759
fox1.PNG


:ROFLMAO:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top