- Aug 8, 2010
- 4,484
- 9,417
Lennon is one of those players who would struggle in a Sunday league team were he of average pace. And 99% of the time those players are just not good enough.
I missed the Chelsea away game so I can't really comment on that bad how many bad games have certain players in our team had to be seen in the starting 11 the next week still? Whether he does something detrimental to his chances behind the scenes we don't know but on the pitch there are other players who have still done worse than him and are still getting considerable game time.
I agree with Chadli prior to his injury/time off. I used to want him in our team just because he was 1 out of about 3 players in out team who could actually find the back of the net. Since that injury though he's been shocking.
I'm not saying that Lennon doesn't need replacing, I've always liked Lennon but even I'd say anyone would be stupid who wouldn't think he needs replacing but IMO he can just offer more than what we have. Also with Lennon I think you know more of what you're getting and I know that's a set up to the reply of "what someone who doesn't score or assist" etc etc. but I feel more of a sense of solidity and structure to the team with him in it.
With Townsend and Lamela especially you really don't know what you're going to get from one game to the next.
Right now I would take someone like Bolassie that isn't 100% consistent but has the potential and balls to take people on and make stuff happen. Other than that we just need that drive back in the squad that we had in the Arse and Chav's game, it seems to have gone since the cup final.
Spot on!I agree.
To be honest, I'd take anyone with some genuine flair over Lamela and Chadli. I cannot stand watching wide players who are as boring as those two. They are just so dull to watch.
I want a player who constantly makes his full back uneasy and puts him on the back foot, drives at him with the ball and whips in crosses or cuts in and shoots.
It makes me miss Ginola so, so much.
They do love to have an aged squadI suppose Everton only loaned him if they could buy him for a set fee at the end of the season?
They are more interested in assembling a team to compete for the "now" which isn't always a bad thing. Having a team full of so called promising youth is not always the holy grail.They do love to have an aged squad
It would be difficult to find a player on this planet who is a down grade on Townsend.A far more effective player, offensively and defensively, than Townsend.
Exactly.Why are people trying to rewrite history? I don't seem to remember many people objecting to him going out on loan given how poor he had been.
Why are people trying to rewrite history? I don't seem to remember many people objecting to him going out on loan given how poor he had been.
I've just watched the Everton match on MOTD and lennon had a cracker but more importantly he wasn't stuck out on the wing, he was playing through the middle and if he was out wide he was coming inside.
The significance of this is that I have said since his first year at Spurs that he is not a natural winger and he scares the living daylights out of defenders when he runs at them through the middle, I've argued it on this forum time and again that's where he should play but because he is fast managers play him on the wing.
Maybe Martinez had seen the same thing and is getting the rewards of a Man of the Match Lennon.
Why are people trying to rewrite history? I don't seem to remember many people objecting to him going out on loan given how poor he had been.