- Jul 20, 2005
- 3,353
- 6,112
- Thread starter
- #41
I gave livermore a 5 and sandro 6 hardly favouritism? You seem to forget other people have opinions- you think livermore was slightly better and I think Sandro. Either way Sandro or Livermore were superfluous and hindered our chances of winning.Sorry, but that's the piont. We could have done with Modric/Moutinho/whover, I'm not disagreeing with that. But Livermore was no worse, and in some ways, better (I know it's heresy) than Sandro. he played some decent balls, he made some decent tackles. he interracted well in midfield. You should judge him on who he is and what he did - unless you are going to judge Sandro negatively, too, because he isn't Modric/Moutinho/whover (but you aren't doing that).