- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,664
- 205,673
- Admin
- #1
New thread
You can discuss the new signing in the player thread. It shouldn't need saying, but well, it's you lot so yeah, sadly, it does.
offset by sales of Carter Vickers and Bergwyn with more sale to come - hopefullyWhats our current outlay looking like?
Peresic - £0
Forster - £0
Bissouma - £25 - £35
Lenglet - £4m Loan Fee
Richarlson £50-£60
Spence - £12-£20
So current liability of Circa £90m
And we had funds of £150M (+ potentially any sales)
No doubt just cause we have it, doesn't mean need to spend it. But appear to be recruiting well, whilst leaving some cash in the bank if we need it
Whats our current outlay looking like?
Peresic - £0
Forster - £0
Bissouma - £25 - £35
Lenglet - £4m Loan Fee
Richarlson £50-£60
Spence - £12-£20
So current liability of Circa £90m
And we had funds of £150M (+ potentially any sales)
No doubt just cause we have it, doesn't mean need to spend it. But appear to be recruiting well, whilst leaving some cash in the bank if we need it
Yup - bear in mind, we've also sold Bergwijn and CCV for a combined ~£34m, plus whatever we got for Clarke.
Not bad at all.
Pretty sure forster and perisic would have negotiated a nice signing on fee, players are never really freeWhats our current outlay looking like?
Peresic - £0
Forster - £0
Bissouma - £25 - £35
Lenglet - £4m Loan Fee
Richarlson £50-£60
Spence - £12-£20
So current liability of Circa £90m
And we had funds of £150M (+ potentially any sales)
No doubt just cause we have it, doesn't mean need to spend it. But appear to be recruiting well, whilst leaving some cash in the bank if we need it
What about Romero, are we buying him this summer or what?Whats our current outlay looking like?
Peresic - £0
Forster - £0
Bissouma - £25 - £35
Lenglet - £4m Loan Fee
Richarlson £50-£60
Spence - £12-£20
So current liability of Circa £90m
And we had funds of £150M (+ potentially any sales)
No doubt just cause we have it, doesn't mean need to spend it. But appear to be recruiting well, whilst leaving some cash in the bank if we need it
Pretty sure forster and perisic would have negotiated a nice signing on fee, players are never really free
I hope soWhat about Romero, are we buying him this summer or what?
I'd imagine the deal would be spread over several payments so we wouldn't pay the fee all up front on him.What about Romero, are we buying him this summer or what?
Didn't we get £10m for Clarke?Yup - bear in mind, we've also sold Bergwijn and CCV for a combined ~£34m, plus whatever we got for Clarke.
Not bad at all.
Yeah i think we pretty much got our money back on him.Didn't we get £10m for Clarke?
I think 99% of transfers are like this anywayI'd imagine the deal would be spread over several payments so we wouldn't pay the fee all up front on him.
Agreed i'd suggest hereSurely there's somewhere else that the general transfer chit chat (round 346) can go?!
Up to 10 with a whole bunch of clauses, that might never happen. The initial sum was low.No way Sunderland paid that surely?
Well this is what is confusing people now. Depending on which journalist is reporting it, the number changes depending on whether they've included addons or not. I'd assume in Clarkes case that's the overall figure. Either include all the clauses on every deal or not at all.No way Sunderland paid that surely?