Search results

  1. R

    New Stadium Details And Discussions

    The FA are only chasing money themselves these days......only they need it to pay for Wembley
  2. R

    New Stadium Details And Discussions

    a two hundred year lease is considered a 'virtual freehold' it's a saleable asset
  3. R

    New Stadium Details And Discussions

    The PL will do whatever is in THEIR best interests. If that involves West Ham going bust to create a bigger PL brand then they'll happily do it.
  4. R

    D Bent sell on fee

    Brum have the option to buy him for £9m
  5. R

    D Bent sell on fee

    Peanut suggested that the clause wasn't 10% but was a kind of 'money back guarantee' on what we paid Charlton for him.....
  6. R

    New Stadium Details And Discussions

    1. How exactly would they manage that? Seriously it's not possible or plausible. 2. They've hired a PR man to win the bid - spending money on his wages is in the overall interest of the club.
  7. R

    New Stadium Details And Discussions

    The THFC board and the fans interests are fundamentally the same - there is no spin, they will do whatever gives the club the greatest chance of success on and off the pitch. I honestly don't care what happens to Haringey, Lammy, the Olympics, Crystal Palace, West Ham or Leyton Orient....
  8. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread (PART 2) - 31 August 2010

    They've set the precedent...... they always get the breaks, the ***** shouldn't even be in the PL
  9. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread (PART 2) - 31 August 2010

    Does that mean it's got international clearance?
  10. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread (PART 2) - 31 August 2010

    Each association has the same amount of transfer window time to use as they like..... that's why some have differing deadlines....
  11. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    that'd be pretty obvious now!....
  12. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    I think the date on which the photo was taken may be relevant...
  13. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    Minor spinal surgery?!
  14. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    He paid his wages last year. If he were prepared to do the same again (and transfer fee) then Keane would've been gone months ago...
  15. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    Celtic are massively in debt they didn't sell to generate funds for Keane - just to stay afloat
  16. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    Hmmmm.... So if Celtic managed to sell another 50,000 shirts (which is being very optimistic) and we assume they make a profit of £20 per shirt (again very optimistic) then they've got an extra £1m Don't see that really helping with a £5m - £8m transfer fee and wages of £65k per week
  17. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    No other way around it. The player won't take a cut when he's being forced out.
  18. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    How will Celtic afford Keane's wages? We'll end up making up the difference on anything more than £40k pw
  19. R

    The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24 August 2010

    I'm sceptical, he knew info about Kjaer through his girlfriend.....not sure Kjaer's GF is itk about any other Spurs transfers.....
  20. R

    [Update 99] Hoofharted re: Hoof is hearing....

    I honestly can't remember him getting anything right other than stuff related to Darren Bent........he is now a Sunderland itk not Spurs
Top