What's new

King OR Gallas? (next season)

Who stays next season - King or Gallas?

  • King stays

    Votes: 62 45.6%
  • Gallas stays

    Votes: 74 54.4%

  • Total voters
    136

spurdownunder

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2007
1,772
74
Ledley is King of the Lane and should remain so next year. Wanna see him lift the CL trophy!
 

ethanedwards

Snowflake incarnate.
Nov 24, 2006
3,379
2,502
We are a better team without the current version of King, sentamentality should not be a factor. He is a train crash waiting to happen.
Thankyou Ledley and good luck.
 

jonathanhotspur

Loose Cannon
Jun 28, 2009
10,292
8,250
King's clearly fucked, he's been molly coddled for the last 4 years, give him a coaching job by all means, but we should not be depending on him as a player any more, it's ridiculous.

I certainly think we could better assign his wage budget.

This. Tired of the circus.
 

The Watcher

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2012
694
622
Much as it pains me to say it, I think we really saw the stationary point or redefinition of limits of Ledley King's playing career against Arsenal.

A few years ago, able to track down Robben and cleanly tackle him from behind preventing an easy goal... Now a shadow of himself - and I don't like saying it, we all know at his peak he was an absolutely amazing defender.

Give him a move upstairs, so to speak. Let him play in the Carling Cup only or as a real last resort on the bench - but he can't be first choice from next season.

With sadness I agree with this, he is in noticeable decline.
However, on a positive note it'd be excellent if he passed his badges and coached the Spurs defence for years to come. The know-how is there, the man's a genius in his field, no one other than Paul McGrath would have lasted this long with those injuries.
 

guy

SC Supporter
May 31, 2007
4,509
6,183
So may people dont now a hyperthetical when slapped in the face with one!?! Jeebus

King for me even though Willy is in better form atm. We need to keep both though IMO
 

InOffMeLeftShin

Night watchman
Admin
Jan 14, 2004
15,105
9,122
Better scenario, we don't waste £15m on Vertonghen (who isn't nearly as good defensively as Vermaelen and I think will struggle in England a little) and use that money on someone else like a striker. Then we keep Kaboul and Caulker (yes he is good enough) as regular starters, Gallas (when fit is inspirational), King (even when not fit is inspirational) and Dawson. Caulker is U21 so wouldn't take a spot in the 25 anyway so we'd only be using 4 spots for central defenders and we'd have still improved on this seasons defensive options.
 

ravo

SC Supporter
Jun 4, 2004
4,787
2,885
King on a pay-as-you-play and coaching contract. Gallas on a one year extension.
 

Andy

Staff
Mar 21, 2005
7,833
418
looking at another side of it, if we let both go which one would get snapped up first and by a team in the top four?or top ten? i could see king going to a top four side and playing 15 games in a season in the league for a side like man city. Gallas would probably end up at somewhere like Liverpool.
King is the better player and lets not judge it on the one off Arsenal game where he was unfit eh?
 

phil

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2004
2,038
1,239
looking at another side of it, if we let both go which one would get snapped up first and by a team in the top four?or top ten? i could see king going to a top four side and playing 15 games in a season in the league for a side like man city. Gallas would probably end up at somewhere like Liverpool.
King is the better player and lets not judge it on the one off Arsenal game where he was unfit eh?

I'm sorry but King is not being judged on his performance against Arsenal. Over the past two seasons our best defensive partnership has been Gallas and Kaboul. We look a lot more solid with Gallas playing and he spends a lot more time (visibly) organising and encouraging the rest of the team.

Both players are in decline but Gallas is playing at a higher level than King. I think that Caulker would learn a lot from playing alongside Gallas. If we buy Vertonghen, I'd be tempted to keep both King and Gallas but sell Dawson, Bassong and Khumalo.
 

Kingstheman

No longer BSoDL
Mar 13, 2006
5,831
2,991
We are a better team without the current version of King, sentamentality should not be a factor. He is a train crash waiting to happen.
Thankyou Ledley and good luck.

All it will take is a match away to a club who play 'rugby' and he's retired in one foul.

Don't want to see that picture.
 

rabbikeane

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2005
6,932
12,767
Don't want to see King forced out and joining another club,
hopefully he's wise enough to retire when it's time.
 

vegassd

The ghost of Johnny Cash
Aug 5, 2006
3,360
3,340
I don't think King will ever leave the club, and I'm quite happy with that situation.

Releasing Gallas would free up a squad place and a fair chunk of the wage bill so he would be the one I would ditch. But only if we do sign a new (and good) CB in the Summer.
 

yido_number1

He'll always be magic
Jun 8, 2004
8,670
16,854
We dont need to release anyone ... if anything it will be Dawson who is worried... Doesnt Gallas have another year left any way?
 

Rout-Ledge

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2005
9,638
21,825
In this scenario, Gallas. Kaboul, Caulker, Dawson, Gallas (if we decide to gamble on throwing Caulker in at the deep emd).
 
Top