- Jan 7, 2009
- 17,094
- 22,286
Aaaaarrgghhhhhhh!!!!!! Can we please stop talking about the fucking FBs!?! The whole team played well and turn this into a debate about the FB's is fucking dull!
Anyway, first thing, all hail Harry :bowdown::bowdown: !!! Ok his hand was forced somewhat by who he had available, but M&S style, he didn't just play 4-2-3-1 he played the right kind of 4-2-3-1!
I read post after post pre-match going on about balance when what they meant was a dull kind of symmetry. Even 4-4-2 doesn't have to be symmetrical; see the way we used to play with Lennon on the right, backed by sitting FB and Modric on the left over-lapped by Bale. In fact asymmetry can be a wonderful, even balanced, thing. Symmetry gave you the First World War, asymmetry is what won the reputations of everyone from Scipio Africanus, to Napoleon Bonapart.
Balance on the other hand is about having a team who can play well with and without the ball, it's about being able to go wide or or through the centre, long or short.
Yesterday we had the best balance I've seen this season between the team on the ball and the team off the ball, and I'm glad to say that it was in a good way and not a bad one.
Ok, it wasn't perfect, at times in the first half we looked a bit anxious, like we we trying to make things happen rather than do the simple thing and let things happen as they inevitably would. I also thought our FBs were a bit wasteful in attacking situations, and we were a bit too congested in the centre at times, where our licence to be fluid resulted in everyone wanting to get on the ball in the same areas. But let's give it time, this is a new way of playing for most and as the game progressed there were signs of them starting to not only get to grips, but to really flow with it.
One thing to emphasise, just as sometimes when we go away from home and don't do well in a 4-4-2 and people are wrong to say "Oh well, it's just the players didn't perform well enough; nothing to do with the formation!", so people are wrong to think our formation yesterday had nothing to do with inducing a poor performance out of Norwich.
For most of the match yesterday they literally had no where to breath. Every long ball heaved forward had a Kaboul/Sandro sandwich on their lumps of strikers, with Gallas sweeping up the pieces.
Not once were we caught on the break, we always had the spare man.
How man times did Sandro make his opposite man pause only for a Parker or Modric to come back and nip the ball off his toes? How often were we exposed on right or left channel despite our FBs spending so much time in the opposition half? Not often, I wonder why?
As dozens of us have been banging on for a season it seems, playing two CMs who can tackle means you have more possession further up the field.
All of which is not to say we must always play 4-2-3-1 in every situation from now on. It's another string to our bow, we have a squad of capable players all of whom need game-time, and different line-ups and formations will better suit different opponents and circumstances. When Lennon and Defoe are back fit it really will be a case of horses for courses.
Finally, here's a short bit from the Telegraph interviewing Redknapp after the match:
"...Bale, swiftly moving in from the left, became ever more influential, marauding through the middle and finishing the game on the right flank. “I played him in a fluid three tonight rather than stick him out on the wing,’’ added Redknapp.
“Sometimes he can be stood out on the wing and people get tight to him and it’s difficult to get him in the game. In the middle, he can be difficult to pick up. When he turns and runs like he did, he’s unstoppable. He’s unplayable. Even against Chelsea I freed him up more late in the game and he slotted in Ade.”
And BC also reports Harry said something along the lines of:
"Q: How many positions did Gareth Bale play tonight ?
HR: Yeah...I basically gave Gareth and Rafa free roles tonight, and said whoever's nearest to defend that channel and if they couldn't get over there one of the others (Modric, Parker, Sandro) will shuffle across.
"
I said before the match:
:bow: