I'll get slated for this no doubt as it's a very unfashionable line to take, but even taking into account that he's very young, I've honestly seen little so far to suggest he'll become anything particularly special.
That's fine, not every player is destined to succeed at the top, and perhaps his game will hugely develop over the next couple of years. But unlike Kane, who scored hatfuls at every age and level, or Mason, who was regularly identified as the most talented of his age group at Spurs, or Bentaleb, who came in from nowhere and dominated midfielders ten years older than him, I'm not currently seeing anything from Onomah which is crying out with potential. I'm just not sure what he's actually supposed to be good at, at the moment. He doesn't score, doesn't really create, doesn't dribble particularly well - he tends to just play fairly accurate short passes and get himself into the odd decent position. He's not actually produced anything so far in his (now quite a few) appearances which is a bit disappointing.
Soz. I look forward to him proving me completely wrong in the future.
Thats where you're wrongI'll get slated for this no doubt as it's a very unfashionable line to take, but even taking into account that he's very young, I've honestly seen little so far to suggest he'll become anything particularly special.
That's fine, not every player is destined to succeed at the top, and perhaps his game will hugely develop over the next couple of years. But unlike Kane, who scored hatfuls at every age and level, or Mason, who was regularly identified as the most talented of his age group at Spurs, or Bentaleb, who came in from nowhere and dominated midfielders ten years older than him, I'm not currently seeing anything from Onomah which is crying out with potential. I'm just not sure what he's actually supposed to be good at, at the moment. He doesn't score, doesn't really create, doesn't dribble particularly well - he tends to just play fairly accurate short passes and get himself into the odd decent position. He's not actually produced anything so far in his (now quite a few) appearances which is a bit disappointing.
Soz. I look forward to him proving me completely wrong in the future.
Sorry mate, but you are genuinely wrong here. Not just a debatable opinion - you're wrong. Onomah made his under-18 debut at 15, his under-21 debut at 16, was regularly starting for the under-21s at 17 and has now become a first-team squad member at 18. He has very much been identified as the most talented of his age group.I'll get slated for this no doubt as it's a very unfashionable line to take, but even taking into account that he's very young, I've honestly seen little so far to suggest he'll become anything particularly special.
That's fine, not every player is destined to succeed at the top, and perhaps his game will hugely develop over the next couple of years. But unlike Kane, who scored hatfuls at every age and level, or Mason, who was regularly identified as the most talented of his age group at Spurs, or Bentaleb, who came in from nowhere and dominated midfielders ten years older than him, I'm not currently seeing anything from Onomah which is crying out with potential. I'm just not sure what he's actually supposed to be good at, at the moment. He doesn't score, doesn't really create, doesn't dribble particularly well - he tends to just play fairly accurate short passes and get himself into the odd decent position. He's not actually produced anything so far in his (now quite a few) appearances which is a bit disappointing.
Soz. I look forward to him proving me completely wrong in the future.
Actually made his debut for the U21's at 15(when technically speaking he was still in year 10, YEAR 10!), he came on, playing in a midfield 3 with Mason and CarrollSorry mate, but you are genuinely wrong here. Not just a debatable opinion - you're wrong. Onomah made his under-18 debut at 15, his under-21 debut at 16, was regularly starting for the under-21s at 17 and has now become a first-team squad member at 18. He has very much been identified as the most talented of his age group.
Onomah started in the 4-1 win over Barcelona in the Nextgen series when he was 15 along side Pritchard, who was 19 and Bentaleb, who was 17. Bacelona started Sandro (who occasionally plays in the 1st team), who was 17 at the time and the highly rated Samper, who was 18.I'll get slated for this no doubt as it's a very unfashionable line to take, but even taking into account that he's very young, I've honestly seen little so far to suggest he'll become anything particularly special.
That's fine, not every player is destined to succeed at the top, and perhaps his game will hugely develop over the next couple of years. But unlike Kane, who scored hatfuls at every age and level, or Mason, who was regularly identified as the most talented of his age group at Spurs, or Bentaleb, who came in from nowhere and dominated midfielders ten years older than him, I'm not currently seeing anything from Onomah which is crying out with potential. I'm just not sure what he's actually supposed to be good at, at the moment. He doesn't score, doesn't really create, doesn't dribble particularly well - he tends to just play fairly accurate short passes and get himself into the odd decent position. He's not actually produced anything so far in his (now quite a few) appearances which is a bit disappointing.
Soz. I look forward to him proving me completely wrong in the future.
Don't see why anyone takes the time to debate with someone writing off an 18 year old. Not really an opinion worth debating now is it? Quite laughable really.
I slagged of Steven Caulker years ago and got slaughtered for it
How he is going to be the next England centrehalf for the next 50 years etc
Now all of you are laughing at him
Whether you end up correct is pretty irrelevant, slagging off anyone that young is just stupid.I slagged of Steven Caulker years ago and got slaughtered for it
How he is going to be the next England centrehalf for the next 50 years etc
Now all of you are laughing at him
Whether you end up correct is pretty irrelevant, slagging off anyone that young is just stupid.
They never learn either do they? Waaaay more of our youth players, in recent years, have gone on to be a success with us after being slagged off. I'm still waiting for @kaz Hirai to eat his pants
I completely agree that writing off an 18-year-old is never good, but Bobbins' post has reasoning and justification for his thoughts, rightly or wrongly.Don't see why anyone takes the time to debate with someone writing off an 18 year old. Not really an opinion worth debating now is it? Quite laughable really.
Yeah but he's wrong in his reasoning from the off.I completely agree that writing off an 18-year-old is never good, but Bobbins' post has reasoning and justification for his thoughts, rightly or wrongly.
I slagged of Steven Caulker years ago and got slaughtered for it
How he is going to be the next England centrehalf for the next 50 years etc
Now all of you are laughing at him
How can anybody's opinion of a player, going by what they've witnessed, be based on a false platform? Why should anybody take into account what a player has done in the youth setup to give an opinion on any first team performance?Yeah but he's wrong in his reasoning from the off.
Others have already noted that he has been identified as one of the best, if not the best in his age group. So he's wrong in that point. Anyone who has seen him against his peers in the U21s will confirm he's an exceptionally good dribbler and good creative player, he is a poor finisher though. So wrong on that count.
So no the post doesn't have reasoning and justification if it's built on a platform that's entirely false.
Considering you considered his post to have "reasoning and justification" you appear to not have read it or not read it well. As he clearly brings up comparisons with Mason and Kane when at youth level.How can anybody's opinion of a player, going by what they've witnessed, be based on a false platform? Why should anybody take into account what a player has done in the youth setup to give an opinion on any first team performance?