- Jul 29, 2011
- 6,993
- 12,594
Would he be getting a start at City, Chelsea, Arsenal, Utd or even Liverpool.. The answer is a clear NO.
Would he be getting a start at City, Chelsea, Arsenal, Utd or even Liverpool.. The answer is a clear NO.
Well Liverpool really wanted him.
There's lots of Utd players over the years who have played a part in their title winning teams that wouldn't have got into our first team.
I never understand this argument. Siggy currently fits quite well into our team and is our joint top league scorer. He is effective for us. I couldn't care less if Utd want him.
Lamela should not be played on the left, its his weakest position across the three and we wouldn't be making the most of his skills. Maybe after he has adjusted to the PL and the squad then play him on the left for the odd game if needed but if we want him to adapt we need to play him in a position he feels more comfortable in first.
Paulinho.Better at getting in the box and scoring goals? Name one!
I don't think he's all that. And he doesn't work that hard either, he just runs like a newborn Calf.
I'd say he does try to do his defensive duties, but his 'hard work' doesn't really achieve anything. He tries to get back in and help out but because he runs like he is wading through quicksand he just about gets within the vicinity of a player to close him down but never quite gets there to make things difficult for the opposing player.
You've changed. You're one of them now.
Yes it felt weird posting that...
I guess I am trying to say that he tries hard not to be pretty useless (bless him), but cant avoid being what he is.
Better?
Much. Welcome back.
Glad to be back. What team are we again, shirts or skins?
There's no way you are busy.We're the busy ****s.
I think people need to take their blinkers off.
Just because he doesn't have the pace of Lennon/Townsend etc, this doesn't mean he isn't an effective wide player.
His return this season so far has been brilliant and is a huge improvement on Dempsey.
He retains possession; more often than not hits the target when shooting; and also provides good cover for whichever defensively lacking fullback is behind him.
And he does work hard, for anybody to suggest otherwise is just hating for the sake of it.
There's no way you are busy.
We're the busy ****s.
I think people need to take their blinkers off.
Just because he doesn't have the pace of Lennon/Townsend etc, this doesn't mean he isn't an effective wide player.
His return this season so far has been brilliant and is a huge improvement on Dempsey.
He retains possession; more often than not hits the target when shooting; and also provides good cover for whichever defensively lacking fullback is behind him.
And he does work hard, for anybody to suggest otherwise is just hating for the sake of it.