There would be a clause in it. I know Dragon has detailed, but more too it than that! I won’t share that here. That would be suicidal.
Suicidal to share!I hope that it would he suicidal to share rather than the proposed clause being suicidal for us.
If there's a clause I don't really see the point in the new contract tbh. Why give him a nice wage hike when he's disrespected the entire club, even if it's only for a season? Doubt the rest of the squad would view it kindly.
Either commit to the club with a new contract without a release clause or don't sign one at all imo.
dragon1 said: regarding HK
they withdrew the fine after initial discussions with Harry sat
What I was told was that he asked for the extra time off and was told no but still took it anyway
The club let the story run as they have been livid largely with Charlie , harry annoyed them with the neville interview pre the villa game when we had a chance of cl or Uefa football he also pissed the dressing room off
Charlie has been leaking to there media the sun showbiz thing was all him as were all the sky and other media stuff , Daniel had had enough
Paul miller is very well connected both with the club and certain players in this case he is giving a statement from the Kane families side of things , the biggest thing you should take from that is that the Kane family are open to discussing a new deal with spurs
I can say with some certainty that one of two things will happen between now and the 23rd of Aug , either Kane will be sold for 160 million plus and Fab will have a good week to spend it in the window or Kane will sign a massive contract I do not believe the club want to do this all over again next summer its not good for Kane or Spurs
Suicidal to share!
I would agree but a large release clause will likely put clubs off imo
Strong whiff of ‘contract offered, not accepted, City bid big, reluctantly agreed, player sold’.