What's new

YOUR FORMATION? (Home games against weaker teams)

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,805
6,465
We don't play 4-5-1.

We have much better chance of scoring with our current formation than we would with a 442. With that formation we wouldn't even control the play! Just sticking two players closer to the opposition goal makes no difference if you can't even get the ball to make chances for them.

Brilliant!
 

Pat Rice Spurs fan

I'm dynamite and I don't know why
Feb 22, 2007
1,610
1,236
Now Timmy's I'm charge

Lloris
Dawson
Lennon Eriksen Townsend
Lamela Adebayor Soldado Kane Chadli
Defoe
 
Last edited:

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,281
21,790
Lloris

Walker

Sandro

Lennon Dembele Paulinho Eriksen Towsend

Lamela Soldado Adebayor


Walker is quite pacey so should be able to recover.

And no-one would get past Sandro anyway.
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
We don't play 4-5-1.

We have much better chance of scoring with our current formation than we would with a 442. With that formation we wouldn't even control the play! Just sticking two players closer to the opposition goal makes no difference if you can't even get the ball to make chances for them.

This was posted on 13 November, by which time we'd played 11 games and scored, er, nine goals, three of them from the spot. Since switching to two strikers we've scored nine in four.

Funny, that.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,527
84,436
Do we now think formation is important?

Seemed like a lot of people thought 4-4-2 was no longer an option.

I don't think it's solely about the formation. If anything you were more right about the importance of Adebayor than the formation.

I don't think we'd have done so well in the last 3 games with a 442 but defoe and Soldado up front.
 

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,805
6,465
I don't think it's solely about the formation. If anything you were more right about the importance of Adebayor than the formation.

I don't think we'd have done so well in the last 3 games with a 442 but defoe and Soldado up front.

That's only because Defoe and Soldado are both poachers.

If you've played upfront on your own in a football match you'd know that it's A LOT HARDER. You have to do much more running, you usually have two defenders on you, no one is making runs off you or for you, etc, etc.

Very few players really excel in that role. Drogba was probably the ultimate lone striker because he had it all. Power, height, pace, skill, etc. You have to be able to do the job of two strikers.

Playing Soldado repeatedly on his own just showed AVB is f*&&ing clueless.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,527
84,436
That's only because Defoe and Soldado are both poachers.

If you've played upfront on your own in a football match you'd know that it's A LOT harder. You have to do much more running, you usually have two defenders on you, no one is making runs off you or for you, etc, etc.

Very few players really excel in that role. Drogba was probably the ultimate lone striker because he had it all. Power, height, pace, skill, etc.

Playing Soldado repeatedly on his own just showed AVB is f*&&ing clueless.

I agree with you there on the playing personnel. But remember Arsenal successfully played RVP as a lone striker as did Owen at times for Liverpool, Torres did too for that matter.

I don't think it's all down to the formation. But yes you are right with our current personnel given their form I'd like us to stick with Ade and Soldado up front.

But maybe in the future Lamela could take one of these roles. We need a system that gets the most out of what we have, down the road that might sometimes involve one out-and-out striker.
 

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,805
6,465
I agree with you there on the playing personnel. But remember Arsenal successfully played RVP as a lone striker as did Owen at times for Liverpool, Torres did too for that matter.

I don't think it's all down to the formation. But yes you are right with our current personnel given their form I'd like us to stick with Ade and Soldado up front.

But maybe in the future Lamela could take one of these roles. We need a system that gets the most out of what we have, down the road that might sometimes involve one out-and-out striker.

The main thing to agree on is that AVB is clueless.

Tactics can be important but confidence is the most valuable asset in sports.

AVB never inspired the players to reach their potential. Not at Chelsea or Tottenham.
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
I agree with you there on the playing personnel. But remember Arsenal successfully played RVP as a lone striker as did Owen at times for Liverpool, Torres did too for that matter.

I don't think it's all down to the formation. But yes you are right with our current personnel given their form I'd like us to stick with Ade and Soldado up front.

But maybe in the future Lamela could take one of these roles. We need a system that gets the most out of what we have, down the road that might sometimes involve one out-and-out striker.

But what they had, and have, and we do not, is reliable goals from midfield. When you've got Lampard, say, you can afford that single striker. VdV and Bale excluded, the most effective midfield goalscorer we've had in years was Jenas. Sig's been a disappointment in that respect, but he's about the best current option we have until Paulinho can find his shooting boots, although Lamela and Eriksen may come good.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,527
84,436
The main thing to agree on is that AVB is clueless.

Tactics can be important but confidence is the most valuable asset in sports.

AVB never inspired the players to reach their potential. Not at Chelsea or Tottenham.

I wouldn't go as far as clueless. Even this season we had a decent points total. I'd agree that he wasn't doing as well as he should have with the squad he had at his disposal.

In life I think you often have 2 choices. Deal with the reality of a situation or bitch about how things should be. The 1st group is often the most successful as they focus on the task at hand and make the best of it. The 2nd group sound intelligent and make good observations but aren't really doing anything.

AVB was from the latter group. He had good ideas on how things should be but in reality to be successful he needed to deal with difficult characters rather than get rid of them and needed to play a formation and system that suited what we have.

He inspired Bale to reach his potential better than Redknapp did so won't write AVB off completely. He just had more failures than successes.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,527
84,436
But what they had, and have, and we do not, is reliable goals from midfield. When you've got Lampard, say, you can afford that single striker. VdV and Bale excluded, the most effective midfield goalscorer we've had in years was Jenas. Sig's been a disappointment in that respect, but he's about the best current option we have until Paulinho can find his shooting boots, although Lamela and Eriksen may come good.

Absolutely. But as I later said if Lamela finds his feet and gets to the top of his game it's possible that we could revert back to a lone striker.

We have struggled with goals from midfield and Soldado and Ade are already showing an excellent understanding with each other. Soldado is starting to show a skill-set I never thought for a second he had.

With the right players and goals from midfield you can play one up front even if he doesn't have Drogba's skill-set. Right now Ade, Soldado and Eriksen are looking very good together.
 
Top