- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,269
- 115,392
I've been reading this thread since 730am. Im well and truly dead...roll on transfer deadline day!
Jesus. Fucking. Christ.
I've been reading this thread since 730am. Im well and truly dead...roll on transfer deadline day!
Well in a business context cash flow is everything so I'd disagree on the not mattering part for Spurs. We, and almost every other club would prefer staggered instalment payments as it allows the books to be balanced more efficiently.
I do agree on the second part though; some of the clauses/add-ons will 100% be implemented as a safe-guard to ensure value is returned on our investment. One I'd fathom would be orientated around goals scored and/or qualification for the CL.
I'm probably in the minority here but £25.8m is a outrageous amount of money to pay for him. We are not a financially doped club like CFC or MCFC hence don't have money to burn. We are getting proper shafted here if we pay that fee...
Well in a business context cash flow is everything so I'd disagree on the not mattering part for Spurs. We, and almost every other club would prefer staggered instalment payments as it allows the books to be balanced more efficiently.
I do agree on the second part though; some of the clauses/add-ons will 100% be implemented as a safe-guard to ensure value is returned on our investment. One I'd fathom would be orientated around goals scored and/or qualification for the CL.
Can you just explain this to me ... what is the difference? I'm not too finance savvy.
Cash flow is king.Can you just explain this to me ... what is the difference? I'm not too finance savvy.
Hunter this evening has said the following....Summary:
Salva is a relatively new president at Valencia and this stance is unusual as the club usual sell when a big offer comes in. He says he's told Spurs that he will not accept a payment structure which is less than the £26m buyout, even if it includes add-ons, but he is willing to negotiate a deal which means Spurs don't pay the full fee now, as long as it IS paid eventually. I didn't quite understand that as surely add-ons ultimately bridge this difference, but then I guess it depends on the add-ons.
So there's certainly scope for more haggling but he's adamant that Valencia receive £26m in full or Soldado will not leave the club this summer.
Hunter said if Spurs think this is the man who can get goals - which he clearly is - and fire them into the Champions League again, then they have to spend big and Soldado is certainly a striker who can offer that. So the ball is in Levy's court.
He also mentioned that Soldado told him last summer he was all set to sign for Spurs having been impressed by the club and our interest but decided to stay at Valencia for another year - so Spurs have that in their favour too.
And... 152 pages
Some of you have been busy...
I've been reading this thread since 730am. Im well and truly dead...roll on transfer deadline day!
I thought it was accepted practice that fees were paid in installments?
No doubt the advent of wanky clubs like the chavs, citeh, Monaco etc has seen that trend decrease, especially when dealing with the bigger player transfers. Valencia, of all clubs FFS, must surely realise that most clubs don't have an endless pot of money to just dip into and slap the whole fee down in one go.
Hunter this evening has said the following....
@BumperGraham: I must say I admire #Soldado as a person and as a striker but that's a very big price indeed.
Not sure that Valencia are playing this right
I agree with him regarding the price, it's a obscene fee imho....
This is all starting to slow down again
£1 today is worth more than £1 in a year.
Cash flow is king.
Obscene?! What. He's a world class striker in his prime. I mean that implies he's in the ten million pound bracket or something.