- Sep 21, 2005
- 9,023
- 13,524
Of course it wasn't an attacking performance, it was a defensive one - that brought about good counter attacking situations that we should of made far more of.
I'm not talking about possession, domination and working their keeper, peppering their goal etc. That was never our game plan and had it been we would of got caned anyway.
What I'm saying is, that the way we set up to play tonight, Arsenal struggle with. Teams like Villa, good counter attacking side, have gone their and beaten them recently playing this way - and really exposed them to boot.
We should of scored more tonight. We were more threatening tonight that last season - where we had twice the possession practically.
You say 'of course', but there are some suggesting it was
If Lloris doesn't have a worldy today, we lose, even when Arsenal are playing pretty poorly. I'm not sure that sounds like a particularly great plan. We should have scored more? They should have scored a lot more, and despite the defence playing well, much of that was down to Lloris
But hey, we all see things differently. I'm happy with the result, I'm happy to not try and go toe to toe with better teams too, at least a point was important. I just don't get people saying our attackers played well in any shape or form. I expect more from all four of them. Adebayor was a joke, Eriksen and Chadli largely anonymous and Lamela irritatingly showpony-esque.
Once we stitch this defensive showing with attacking of QPR/Sunderland, we'll be in business