- May 17, 2004
- 3,758
- 2,813
Personally I'd have started Son, I do think he's invariably better when started than brought on, but it's not like this erraticness is unique event.
To be fair it's the same with Alli and Lamela too (and today even Eriksen was at it), all are capable of game changing events, but you get a lot of erraticness and carelessness too.
I think to ignore the atrociousness is to ignore why we were in trouble on the first place - partly anyway. IMO.
And yes, his directness, running at the defence and trying to get beyond them is ultimately what earned two vital goals, but lets again be brutally honest, those two contributions weren't crowned with sublime skill, but a cross that was palmed by their keeper into Kane's path (the same kind of fortune that got them their first) and a stupid reckless challenge that gave a way a penalty where their was really quite minimal danger (Son wasn't exactly going to score or sure to create anything form where he was).
Son is the only player we have who runs at defenders at pace and does it in or close to the box where it matters most. Not Lamela, not Alli , not Kane. He has to play and he is most effective on the left. Yes, a lot of his runs come to nothing but we have nobody else ( unless Nkoudou come through ) who can do what Son does. I would love to see stats showing how successful his dribbles are on the left compared to the tight.