I could write a nice little explanation which would fit the facts and it would prove absolutely nothing. I could produce examples of why I'm right and LL's wrong until the cows come home and I'd prove absolutely nothing except that I'm good at making up reasons and creating scenarios to prove I'm right. That's why I just offered my opinion.
If you want a bone to chew on however, first ask yourself what you want to be true, second ask yourself what other prejudices you might hold, then try and find our why you might be wrong, and then try and find reasons why the other guy might be right and finally let your conclusion flow from that. Follow that method religiously and you won't go far wrong.
Ok lets hear them and see which sound more realistic.I'm pretty confident your argument, for berbatov deliberately playing badly for a sustained period of time will be off.But lets see.
Care to share?